Westshore Terminals Investment Corp (WTE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp (WTE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$93.94 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.85 Billion) in one year. Explore Westshore Terminals Investment Corp long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Westshore Terminals Investment Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore Westshore Terminals Investment Corp asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Westshore Terminals Investment Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Westshore Terminals Investment Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see WTE stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$406.70 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$396.07 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | CA$189.59 Million | CA$665.09 Million | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | CA$91.20 Million | CA$546.09 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2021 | 0.27x | CA$136.57 Million | CA$508.38 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | CA$176.39 Million | CA$510.82 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | CA$164.02 Million | CA$497.47 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2018 | 0.79x | CA$161.32 Million | CA$205.32 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2017 | 0.58x | CA$133.20 Million | CA$228.11 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2016 | 0.58x | CA$115.32 Million | CA$198.14 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2015 | 0.95x | CA$198.20 Million | CA$208.97 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | CA$141.61 Million | CA$166.09 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2013 | 1.12x | CA$176.05 Million | CA$157.73 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2012 | 0.65x | CA$100.07 Million | CA$154.37 Million | ▲ +184.1% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | CA$113.27 Million | CA$496.39 Million | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2010 | 1.23x | CA$116.42 Million | CA$94.49 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2009 | 1.61x | CA$123.57 Million | CA$76.85 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2008 | 1.34x | CA$131.47 Million | CA$98.04 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2007 | 1.11x | CA$89.67 Million | CA$80.66 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2006 | 1.59x | CA$93.48 Million | CA$58.70 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2005 | 1.89x | CA$89.01 Million | CA$46.98 Million | ▲ +274.0% |
| 2004 | 0.51x | CA$45.43 Million | CA$89.68 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2003 | 0.78x | CA$38.02 Million | CA$48.58 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2002 | 3.84x | CA$42.65 Million | CA$11.09 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2001 | 3.15x | CA$49.48 Million | CA$15.69 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 3.30x | CA$45.62 Million | CA$13.82 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 1999 | 5.41x | CA$48.75 Million | CA$9.01 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 1998 | 4.46x | CA$60.73 Million | CA$13.62 Million | — |