Westshore Terminals Investment Corp (WTE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp (WTE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$112.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.58 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Westshore Terminals Investment Corp to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Westshore Terminals Investment Corp across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Westshore Terminals Investment Corp cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Westshore Terminals Investment Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Westshore Terminals Investment Corp. Check Westshore Terminals Investment Corp (WTE) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$406.70 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$396.07 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | CA$189.59 Million | CA$665.09 Million | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | CA$91.20 Million | CA$546.09 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2021 | 0.27x | CA$136.57 Million | CA$508.38 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | CA$176.39 Million | CA$510.82 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | CA$164.02 Million | CA$497.47 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2018 | 0.79x | CA$161.32 Million | CA$205.32 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2017 | 0.58x | CA$133.20 Million | CA$228.11 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2016 | 0.58x | CA$115.32 Million | CA$198.14 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2015 | 0.95x | CA$198.20 Million | CA$208.97 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | CA$141.61 Million | CA$166.09 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2013 | 1.12x | CA$176.05 Million | CA$157.73 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2012 | 0.65x | CA$100.07 Million | CA$154.37 Million | ▲ +184.1% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | CA$113.27 Million | CA$496.39 Million | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2010 | 1.23x | CA$116.42 Million | CA$94.49 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2009 | 1.61x | CA$123.57 Million | CA$76.85 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2008 | 1.34x | CA$131.47 Million | CA$98.04 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2007 | 1.11x | CA$89.67 Million | CA$80.66 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2006 | 1.59x | CA$93.48 Million | CA$58.70 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2005 | 1.89x | CA$89.01 Million | CA$46.98 Million | ▲ +274.0% |
| 2004 | 0.51x | CA$45.43 Million | CA$89.68 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2003 | 0.78x | CA$38.02 Million | CA$48.58 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2002 | 3.84x | CA$42.65 Million | CA$11.09 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2001 | 3.15x | CA$49.48 Million | CA$15.69 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 3.30x | CA$45.62 Million | CA$13.82 Million | ▼ -39.0% |
| 1999 | 5.41x | CA$48.75 Million | CA$9.01 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 1998 | 4.46x | CA$60.73 Million | CA$13.62 Million | — |