Exco Technologies Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Exco Technologies Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Exco Technologies Limited (XTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$21.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$206.99 Million) in one year. Check Exco Technologies Limited total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Exco Technologies Limited (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Exco Technologies Limited from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Exco Technologies Limited across 32 annual periods. Check how high is Exco Technologies Limited's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Exco Technologies Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Exco Technologies Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Exco Technologies Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Exco Technologies Limited cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.32x | CA$65.84 Million | CA$206.99 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2024 | 0.36x | CA$81.74 Million | CA$225.73 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | CA$58.17 Million | CA$241.05 Million | ▲ +134.2% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$23.47 Million | CA$227.81 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2021 | 0.56x | CA$47.79 Million | CA$85.07 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2020 | 0.82x | CA$64.42 Million | CA$78.77 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2019 | 0.67x | CA$64.82 Million | CA$96.56 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | CA$48.83 Million | CA$117.72 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2017 | 0.51x | CA$66.41 Million | CA$129.96 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | CA$65.47 Million | CA$173.54 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | CA$41.23 Million | CA$97.89 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | CA$40.37 Million | CA$87.89 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2013 | 0.74x | CA$22.88 Million | CA$30.97 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2012 | 0.92x | CA$31.34 Million | CA$33.90 Million | ▲ +379.1% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | CA$6.64 Million | CA$34.42 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2010 | 0.55x | CA$16.21 Million | CA$29.65 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2009 | 0.61x | CA$15.39 Million | CA$25.40 Million | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | CA$12.37 Million | CA$36.62 Million | ▼ -43.4% |
| 2007 | 0.60x | CA$22.56 Million | CA$37.80 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2006 | 0.42x | CA$21.18 Million | CA$50.74 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | CA$19.16 Million | CA$62.52 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | CA$23.81 Million | CA$62.00 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | CA$22.36 Million | CA$75.81 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2002 | 0.43x | CA$31.04 Million | CA$71.58 Million | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2001 | 0.35x | CA$29.46 Million | CA$83.50 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | CA$20.10 Million | CA$73.40 Million | ▼ -77.8% |
| 1999 | 1.23x | CA$29.80 Million | CA$24.20 Million | ▲ +295.0% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | CA$14.90 Million | CA$47.80 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | CA$15.60 Million | CA$39.00 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 1996 | 0.23x | CA$5.80 Million | CA$24.70 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | CA$8.90 Million | CA$25.70 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 1994 | 0.60x | CA$16.30 Million | CA$27.10 Million | — |