Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology Inc (3006) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology Inc (3006) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$273.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$7.88 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology In to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology Inc across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 3006 cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology Inc (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology Inc. Check 3006 cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TWD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | NT$109.55 Million | NT$7.38 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | NT$186.93 Million | NT$8.18 Billion | ▲ +105.4% |
| 2022 | -0.43x | NT$-3.53 Billion | NT$8.29 Billion | ▼ -138.9% |
| 2021 | 1.09x | NT$8.29 Billion | NT$7.58 Billion | ▲ +1075.4% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | NT$453.35 Million | NT$4.87 Billion | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2019 | 0.59x | NT$1.85 Billion | NT$3.14 Billion | ▲ +400.5% |
| 2018 | -0.20x | NT$-596.91 Million | NT$3.04 Billion | ▼ -150.5% |
| 2017 | 0.39x | NT$950.59 Million | NT$2.45 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2016 | 0.48x | NT$1.13 Billion | NT$2.33 Billion | ▲ +163.0% |
| 2015 | -0.77x | NT$-1.51 Billion | NT$1.96 Billion | ▼ -333.3% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | NT$1.29 Billion | NT$3.91 Billion | ▼ -42.8% |
| 2013 | 0.57x | NT$1.23 Billion | NT$2.13 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2012 | 0.56x | NT$715.96 Million | NT$1.27 Billion | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2011 | 0.64x | NT$648.87 Million | NT$1.02 Billion | ▲ +200.7% |
| 2010 | -0.63x | NT$-751.11 Million | NT$1.18 Billion | ▼ -216.3% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | NT$627.28 Million | NT$1.15 Billion | ▲ +181.9% |
| 2008 | -0.67x | NT$-447.68 Million | NT$672.96 Million | ▼ -192.0% |
| 2007 | 0.72x | NT$1.23 Billion | NT$1.70 Billion | ▲ +775.6% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | NT$-143.71 Million | NT$1.34 Billion | ▼ -129.5% |
| 2005 | 0.36x | NT$647.15 Million | NT$1.78 Billion | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2004 | 0.64x | NT$1.06 Billion | NT$1.67 Billion | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2003 | 0.89x | NT$1.51 Billion | NT$1.69 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2002 | 0.47x | NT$630.67 Million | NT$1.34 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2001 | 1.42x | NT$1.49 Billion | NT$1.05 Billion | — |