Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd (6451) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.03x

Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd (6451) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$-302.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$12.08 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$-302.73 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$12.08 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd across 13 annual periods. Also explore Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd (2012–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shunsin Technology Holdings Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 6451 stock market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.04x NT$394.62 Million NT$9.00 Billion ▼ -82.3%
2023 0.25x NT$1.86 Billion NT$7.51 Billion ▲ +284.3%
2022 0.06x NT$621.18 Million NT$9.61 Billion ▲ +166.4%
2021 0.02x NT$204.72 Million NT$8.44 Billion ▼ -89.2%
2020 0.22x NT$1.89 Billion NT$8.45 Billion ▼ -33.1%
2019 0.33x NT$1.93 Billion NT$5.78 Billion ▲ +1236.5%
2018 -0.03x NT$-149.74 Million NT$5.09 Billion ▼ -160.8%
2017 0.05x NT$163.06 Million NT$3.37 Billion ▼ -91.4%
2016 0.56x NT$1.31 Billion NT$2.34 Billion ▼ -48.0%
2015 1.08x NT$1.64 Billion NT$1.51 Billion ▲ +210.8%
2014 0.35x NT$801.48 Million NT$2.30 Billion ▼ -42.0%
2013 0.60x NT$1.01 Billion NT$1.69 Billion ▼ -64.0%
2012 1.67x NT$1.59 Billion NT$953.40 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.