Altamira Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Altamira Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Altamira Gold Corp (ALTA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.33x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-216.33K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$653.54K) in one year. See Altamira Gold Corp free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Altamira Gold Corp (2002–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Altamira Gold Corp from 2002 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Altamira Gold Corp across 26 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Altamira Gold Corp to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Altamira Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2026)
Altamira Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Altamira Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Altamira Gold Corp (ALTA) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -2.44x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$572.08K | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2025 | -5.17x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$193.48K | ▼ -244.7% |
| 2024 | -1.50x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$712.32K | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2023 | -1.36x | CA$-987.46K | CA$726.68K | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2022 | -2.00x | CA$-913.31K | CA$457.38K | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2021 | -2.45x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$434.24K | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2020 | -1.30x | CA$-752.82K | CA$577.99K | ▲ +54.8% |
| 2019 | -2.88x | CA$-931.54K | CA$323.55K | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2018 | -3.38x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$446.73K | ▼ -105.8% |
| 2017 | -1.64x | CA$-1.27 Million | CA$773.47K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2016 | -5.93x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$324.00K | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2015 | -4.32x | CA$-630.90K | CA$145.88K | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2015 | -5.91x | CA$-426.47K | CA$72.20K | ▼ -362.8% |
| 2014 | -1.28x | CA$-178.32K | CA$139.72K | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2013 | -2.93x | CA$-402.95K | CA$137.53K | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2012 | -3.01x | CA$-780.09K | CA$258.93K | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2011 | -2.56x | CA$-503.36K | CA$196.29K | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2010 | -2.66x | CA$-415.69K | CA$156.10K | ▼ -161.2% |
| 2009 | -1.02x | CA$-669.64K | CA$656.89K | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2008 | -1.07x | CA$-609.53K | CA$568.51K | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2007 | -1.39x | CA$-780.59K | CA$559.66K | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2006 | -1.30x | CA$-589.04K | CA$452.93K | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2005 | -4.38x | CA$-847.71K | CA$193.50K | ▼ -9014.4% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | CA$31.25K | CA$635.82K | ▲ +108.4% |
| 2003 | -0.58x | CA$-210.66K | CA$361.36K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2002 | -0.60x | CA$-233.47K | CA$389.06K | — |