Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-84.48K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$34.62 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore AME total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-324.76K | CA$31.76 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | CA$-424.60K | CA$27.76 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | CA$-552.30K | CA$24.47 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | CA$-2.03 Million | CA$22.24 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-469.37K | CA$17.83 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$16.01 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$14.42 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2016 | -0.05x | CA$-616.06K | CA$12.33 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | CA$-562.53K | CA$7.99 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2014 | -7.69x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$156.60K | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2013 | -16.77x | CA$-791.22K | CA$47.19K | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2012 | -15.28x | CA$-2.36 Million | CA$154.26K | ▼ -4770.9% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$6.01 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$14.94 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$4.95 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2008 | -0.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▼ -149.0% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | CA$-562.45K | CA$2.37 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2006 | -1.64x | CA$-613.24K | CA$373.24K | ▼ -647.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | CA$198.66K | CA$661.64K | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2004 | -14.49x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$105.85K | ▼ -127.3% |
| 2003 | -6.37x | CA$-330.52K | CA$51.86K | ▼ -239.7% |
| 2002 | -1.88x | CA$-302.74K | CA$161.38K | ▼ -140.0% |
| 2001 | -0.78x | CA$-153.04K | CA$195.80K | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2000 | -0.73x | CA$-186.63K | CA$256.40K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 1999 | -0.75x | CA$-300.00K | CA$400.00K | ▼ -400.0% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | CA$100.00K | CA$400.00K | ▲ +112.5% |
| 1996 | -2.00x | CA$-200.00K | CA$100.00K | — |