Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-109.77K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$36.41 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp across 29 annual periods. Check Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.01x | CA$-398.74K | CA$35.54 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-324.76K | CA$31.76 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | CA$-424.60K | CA$27.76 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | CA$-552.30K | CA$24.47 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | CA$-2.03 Million | CA$22.24 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-469.37K | CA$17.83 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$16.01 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$14.42 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2016 | -0.05x | CA$-616.06K | CA$12.33 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | CA$-562.53K | CA$7.99 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2014 | -7.69x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$156.60K | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2013 | -16.77x | CA$-791.22K | CA$47.19K | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2012 | -15.28x | CA$-2.36 Million | CA$154.26K | ▼ -4770.9% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$6.01 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$14.94 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$4.95 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2008 | -0.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▼ -149.0% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | CA$-562.45K | CA$2.37 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2006 | -1.64x | CA$-613.24K | CA$373.24K | ▼ -647.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | CA$198.66K | CA$661.64K | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2004 | -14.49x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$105.85K | ▼ -127.3% |
| 2003 | -6.37x | CA$-330.52K | CA$51.86K | ▼ -239.7% |
| 2002 | -1.88x | CA$-302.74K | CA$161.38K | ▼ -140.0% |
| 2001 | -0.78x | CA$-153.04K | CA$195.80K | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2000 | -0.73x | CA$-186.63K | CA$256.40K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 1999 | -0.75x | CA$-300.00K | CA$400.00K | ▼ -400.0% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | CA$100.00K | CA$400.00K | ▲ +112.5% |
| 1996 | -2.00x | CA$-200.00K | CA$100.00K | — |