Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-109.77K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$36.41 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AME cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp. Check Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.01x | CA$-398.74K | CA$35.54 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-324.76K | CA$31.76 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | CA$-424.60K | CA$27.76 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | CA$-552.30K | CA$24.47 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | CA$-2.03 Million | CA$22.24 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-469.37K | CA$17.83 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$16.01 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$14.42 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2016 | -0.05x | CA$-616.06K | CA$12.33 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | CA$-562.53K | CA$7.99 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2014 | -7.69x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$156.60K | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2013 | -16.77x | CA$-791.22K | CA$47.19K | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2012 | -15.28x | CA$-2.36 Million | CA$154.26K | ▼ -4770.9% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$6.01 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$14.94 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$4.95 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2008 | -0.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▼ -149.0% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | CA$-562.45K | CA$2.37 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2006 | -1.64x | CA$-613.24K | CA$373.24K | ▼ -647.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | CA$198.66K | CA$661.64K | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2004 | -14.49x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$105.85K | ▼ -127.3% |
| 2003 | -6.37x | CA$-330.52K | CA$51.86K | ▼ -239.7% |
| 2002 | -1.88x | CA$-302.74K | CA$161.38K | ▼ -140.0% |
| 2001 | -0.78x | CA$-153.04K | CA$195.80K | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2000 | -0.73x | CA$-186.63K | CA$256.40K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 1999 | -0.75x | CA$-300.00K | CA$400.00K | ▼ -400.0% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | CA$100.00K | CA$400.00K | ▲ +112.5% |
| 1996 | -2.00x | CA$-200.00K | CA$100.00K | — |