Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-84.48K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$34.62 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore AME shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AME company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | CA$-324.76K | CA$31.76 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | CA$-424.60K | CA$27.76 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | CA$-552.30K | CA$24.47 Million | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | CA$-2.03 Million | CA$22.24 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2020 | -0.05x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$19.46 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-469.37K | CA$17.83 Million | ▲ +70.3% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$16.01 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$14.42 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2016 | -0.05x | CA$-616.06K | CA$12.33 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | CA$-562.53K | CA$7.99 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2014 | -7.69x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$156.60K | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2013 | -16.77x | CA$-791.22K | CA$47.19K | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2012 | -15.28x | CA$-2.36 Million | CA$154.26K | ▼ -4770.9% |
| 2011 | -0.31x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$6.01 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$14.94 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$4.95 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2008 | -0.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▼ -149.0% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | CA$-562.45K | CA$2.37 Million | ▲ +85.6% |
| 2006 | -1.64x | CA$-613.24K | CA$373.24K | ▼ -647.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | CA$198.66K | CA$661.64K | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2004 | -14.49x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$105.85K | ▼ -127.3% |
| 2003 | -6.37x | CA$-330.52K | CA$51.86K | ▼ -239.7% |
| 2002 | -1.88x | CA$-302.74K | CA$161.38K | ▼ -140.0% |
| 2001 | -0.78x | CA$-153.04K | CA$195.80K | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2000 | -0.73x | CA$-186.63K | CA$256.40K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 1999 | -0.75x | CA$-300.00K | CA$400.00K | ▼ -400.0% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | CA$100.00K | CA$400.00K | ▲ +112.5% |
| 1996 | -2.00x | CA$-200.00K | CA$100.00K | — |