Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of September 2017. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$9.86 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2016)
This chart shows how Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 19 annual periods from 1996 to 2016. As of September 2017, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$9.86 Million with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see AME company net worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (1996–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp from 1996 to 2016, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore capital reinvestment ratio of Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$10.78 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$23.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$40.76 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$48.75 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$44.33 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$44.49 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$45.17 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$45.21 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$45.91 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$46.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$31.17 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$37.18 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$27.77 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$42.71 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$48.93 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$53.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$51.03 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$53.57 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$49.54 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$51.91 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$33.24 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$33.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$14.56 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$15.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$5.36 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$2.26 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$435.81K | CA$0.00 | CA$597.18K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$10.94 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$11.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$12.80 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$13.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$12.30 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$12.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | CA$9.30 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$9.40 Million | — |