Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of September 2017. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$9.86 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (AME) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2016)
This chart shows how Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 19 annual periods from 1996 to 2016. As of September 2017, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$9.86 Million with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp (1996–2016)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp from 1996 to 2016, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$10.78 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$23.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$40.76 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$48.75 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$44.33 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$44.49 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$45.17 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$45.21 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$45.91 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$46.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$31.17 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$37.18 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$27.77 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$42.71 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$48.93 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$53.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$51.03 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$53.57 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$49.54 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$51.91 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$33.24 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$33.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$14.56 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$15.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$5.36 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$2.26 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$435.81K | CA$0.00 | CA$597.18K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$10.94 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$11.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$12.80 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$13.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$12.30 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$12.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | CA$9.30 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$9.40 Million | — |