American Manganese Inc (AMY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Manganese Inc (AMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.15x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-657.75K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.45 Million) in one year. Explore AMY long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Manganese Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Manganese Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore American Manganese Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Manganese Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Manganese Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see American Manganese Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -22.06x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$72.31K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2024 | -22.72x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$79.22K | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | -25.23x | CA$-4.15 Million | CA$164.59K | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2022 | -23.71x | CA$-4.71 Million | CA$198.45K | ▼ -499.8% |
| 2021 | -3.95x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$545.27K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2020 | -5.65x | CA$-812.50K | CA$143.69K | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2019 | -50.88x | CA$-2.29 Million | CA$45.09K | ▼ -488.0% |
| 2018 | -8.65x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$222.59K | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2017 | -5.88x | CA$-2.25 Million | CA$382.05K | ▼ -3542.2% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | CA$-157.11K | CA$973.12K | ▼ -275.5% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | CA$-38.91K | CA$904.78K | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2014 | -0.31x | CA$-235.50K | CA$760.93K | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2013 | -1.39x | CA$-983.70K | CA$706.71K | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2012 | -7.09x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$536.96K | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2011 | -7.24x | CA$-2.78 Million | CA$384.58K | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2010 | -8.51x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$123.95K | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2009 | -2.26x | CA$-969.89K | CA$428.41K | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2008 | -2.43x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$449.67K | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2007 | -1.38x | CA$-516.27K | CA$373.12K | ▼ -3881.2% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | CA$-35.77K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | CA$-35.07K | CA$950.16K | ▼ -1059.3% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | CA$3.31K | CA$860.55K | ▲ +105.3% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-52.87K | CA$731.92K | ▼ -3998.0% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | CA$-1.20K | CA$679.66K | ▲ +99.7% |
| 2001 | -0.64x | CA$-408.85K | CA$641.81K | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2000 | -0.36x | CA$-217.62K | CA$601.49K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | CA$-106.78K | CA$220.20K | ▼ -979.1% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | CA$-6.57K | CA$146.28K | — |