American Manganese Inc (AMY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Manganese Inc (AMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.15x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-657.75K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.45 Million) in one year. See AMY free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Manganese Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Manganese Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does American Manganese Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Manganese Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Manganese Inc. Check AMY cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -22.06x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$72.31K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2024 | -22.72x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$79.22K | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | -25.23x | CA$-4.15 Million | CA$164.59K | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2022 | -23.71x | CA$-4.71 Million | CA$198.45K | ▼ -499.8% |
| 2021 | -3.95x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$545.27K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2020 | -5.65x | CA$-812.50K | CA$143.69K | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2019 | -50.88x | CA$-2.29 Million | CA$45.09K | ▼ -488.0% |
| 2018 | -8.65x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$222.59K | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2017 | -5.88x | CA$-2.25 Million | CA$382.05K | ▼ -3542.2% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | CA$-157.11K | CA$973.12K | ▼ -275.5% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | CA$-38.91K | CA$904.78K | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2014 | -0.31x | CA$-235.50K | CA$760.93K | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2013 | -1.39x | CA$-983.70K | CA$706.71K | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2012 | -7.09x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$536.96K | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2011 | -7.24x | CA$-2.78 Million | CA$384.58K | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2010 | -8.51x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$123.95K | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2009 | -2.26x | CA$-969.89K | CA$428.41K | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2008 | -2.43x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$449.67K | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2007 | -1.38x | CA$-516.27K | CA$373.12K | ▼ -3881.2% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | CA$-35.77K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | CA$-35.07K | CA$950.16K | ▼ -1059.3% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | CA$3.31K | CA$860.55K | ▲ +105.3% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-52.87K | CA$731.92K | ▼ -3998.0% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | CA$-1.20K | CA$679.66K | ▲ +99.7% |
| 2001 | -0.64x | CA$-408.85K | CA$641.81K | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2000 | -0.36x | CA$-217.62K | CA$601.49K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | CA$-106.78K | CA$220.20K | ▼ -979.1% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | CA$-6.57K | CA$146.28K | — |