American Manganese Inc (AMY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Manganese Inc (AMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.19x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-835.62K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.46 Million) in one year. See American Manganese Inc (AMY) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Manganese Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Manganese Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of American Manganese Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Manganese Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Manganese Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AMY stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -22.06x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$72.31K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2024 | -22.72x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$79.22K | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | -25.23x | CA$-4.15 Million | CA$164.59K | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2022 | -23.71x | CA$-4.71 Million | CA$198.45K | ▼ -499.8% |
| 2021 | -3.95x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$545.27K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2020 | -5.65x | CA$-812.50K | CA$143.69K | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2019 | -50.88x | CA$-2.29 Million | CA$45.09K | ▼ -488.0% |
| 2018 | -8.65x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$222.59K | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2017 | -5.88x | CA$-2.25 Million | CA$382.05K | ▼ -3542.2% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | CA$-157.11K | CA$973.12K | ▼ -275.5% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | CA$-38.91K | CA$904.78K | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2014 | -0.31x | CA$-235.50K | CA$760.93K | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2013 | -1.39x | CA$-983.70K | CA$706.71K | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2012 | -7.09x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$536.96K | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2011 | -7.24x | CA$-2.78 Million | CA$384.58K | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2010 | -8.51x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$123.95K | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2009 | -2.26x | CA$-969.89K | CA$428.41K | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2008 | -2.43x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$449.67K | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2007 | -1.38x | CA$-516.27K | CA$373.12K | ▼ -3881.2% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | CA$-35.77K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | CA$-35.07K | CA$950.16K | ▼ -1059.3% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | CA$3.31K | CA$860.55K | ▲ +105.3% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-52.87K | CA$731.92K | ▼ -3998.0% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | CA$-1.20K | CA$679.66K | ▲ +99.7% |
| 2001 | -0.64x | CA$-408.85K | CA$641.81K | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2000 | -0.36x | CA$-217.62K | CA$601.49K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | CA$-106.78K | CA$220.20K | ▼ -979.1% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | CA$-6.57K | CA$146.28K | — |