American Manganese Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Manganese Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. American Manganese Inc (AMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.15x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-657.75K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.45 Million) in one year. Check American Manganese Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of American Manganese Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of American Manganese Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for American Manganese Inc across 28 annual periods. Check American Manganese Inc (AMY) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
American Manganese Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
American Manganese Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Manganese Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see American Manganese Inc (AMY) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -22.06x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$72.31K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2024 | -22.72x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$79.22K | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | -25.23x | CA$-4.15 Million | CA$164.59K | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2022 | -23.71x | CA$-4.71 Million | CA$198.45K | ▼ -499.8% |
| 2021 | -3.95x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$545.27K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2020 | -5.65x | CA$-812.50K | CA$143.69K | ▲ +88.9% |
| 2019 | -50.88x | CA$-2.29 Million | CA$45.09K | ▼ -488.0% |
| 2018 | -8.65x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$222.59K | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2017 | -5.88x | CA$-2.25 Million | CA$382.05K | ▼ -3542.2% |
| 2016 | -0.16x | CA$-157.11K | CA$973.12K | ▼ -275.5% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | CA$-38.91K | CA$904.78K | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2014 | -0.31x | CA$-235.50K | CA$760.93K | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2013 | -1.39x | CA$-983.70K | CA$706.71K | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2012 | -7.09x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$536.96K | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2011 | -7.24x | CA$-2.78 Million | CA$384.58K | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2010 | -8.51x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$123.95K | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2009 | -2.26x | CA$-969.89K | CA$428.41K | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2008 | -2.43x | CA$-1.09 Million | CA$449.67K | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2007 | -1.38x | CA$-516.27K | CA$373.12K | ▼ -3881.2% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | CA$-35.77K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | CA$-35.07K | CA$950.16K | ▼ -1059.3% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | CA$3.31K | CA$860.55K | ▲ +105.3% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-52.87K | CA$731.92K | ▼ -3998.0% |
| 2002 | 0.00x | CA$-1.20K | CA$679.66K | ▲ +99.7% |
| 2001 | -0.64x | CA$-408.85K | CA$641.81K | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2000 | -0.36x | CA$-217.62K | CA$601.49K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | CA$-106.78K | CA$220.20K | ▼ -979.1% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | CA$-6.57K | CA$146.28K | — |