American Manganese Inc (AMY) — Net Asset Quality Index
American Manganese Inc (AMY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 76.7% as of April 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$19.10 Million minus total liabilities of CA$4.45 Million yields net assets of CA$14.65 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read AMY liabilities breakdown for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
American Manganese Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2025)
This chart shows how American Manganese Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of April 2026, the index stands at 76.7%, representing net assets of CA$14.65 Million against total assets of CA$19.10 Million CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see American Manganese Inc (AMY) market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for American Manganese Inc (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for American Manganese Inc from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check American Manganese Inc PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.6% | CA$16.35 Million | CA$16.42 Million | CA$72.31K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 99.6% | CA$18.19 Million | CA$18.27 Million | CA$79.22K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2023 | 99.2% | CA$19.73 Million | CA$19.89 Million | CA$164.59K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 99.1% | CA$22.09 Million | CA$22.29 Million | CA$198.45K | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2021 | 92.7% | CA$6.90 Million | CA$7.44 Million | CA$545.27K | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2020 | 83.3% | CA$717.34K | CA$861.03K | CA$143.69K | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2019 | 95.8% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.07 Million | CA$45.09K | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2018 | 96.7% | CA$6.53 Million | CA$6.76 Million | CA$222.59K | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2017 | 93.5% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$5.85 Million | CA$382.05K | ▲ +11.5 pp |
| 2016 | 82.0% | CA$4.43 Million | CA$5.40 Million | CA$973.12K | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2015 | 84.6% | CA$4.96 Million | CA$5.86 Million | CA$904.78K | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2014 | 92.4% | CA$9.25 Million | CA$10.01 Million | CA$760.93K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2013 | 92.9% | CA$9.19 Million | CA$9.90 Million | CA$706.71K | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2012 | 95.5% | CA$11.46 Million | CA$12.00 Million | CA$536.96K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2011 | 97.4% | CA$14.46 Million | CA$14.84 Million | CA$384.58K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 97.3% | CA$4.52 Million | CA$4.64 Million | CA$123.95K | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2009 | 88.6% | CA$3.32 Million | CA$3.74 Million | CA$428.41K | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2008 | 86.2% | CA$2.81 Million | CA$3.26 Million | CA$449.67K | ▲ +9.7 pp |
| 2007 | 76.5% | CA$1.22 Million | CA$1.59 Million | CA$373.12K | ▲ +264.2 pp |
| 2006 | -187.7% | CA$-671.37K | CA$357.74K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +3320.0 pp |
| 2005 | -3507.7% | CA$-923.83K | CA$26.34K | CA$950.16K | ▼ -2250.8 pp |
| 2004 | -1256.9% | CA$-797.13K | CA$63.42K | CA$860.55K | ▲ +36177.6 pp |
| 2003 | -37434.6% | CA$-729.97K | CA$1.95K | CA$731.92K | ▼ -14510.8 pp |
| 2002 | -22923.7% | CA$-676.71K | CA$2.95K | CA$679.66K | ▼ -16008.6 pp |
| 2001 | -6915.1% | CA$-632.66K | CA$9.15K | CA$641.81K | ▼ -6637.6 pp |
| 2000 | -277.5% | CA$-442.17K | CA$159.33K | CA$601.49K | ▼ -235.1 pp |
| 1999 | -42.5% | CA$-65.62K | CA$154.57K | CA$220.20K | ▼ -133.9 pp |
| 1998 | 91.4% | CA$1.56 Million | CA$1.71 Million | CA$146.28K | — |