American Manganese Inc (AMY) — Net Asset Quality Index
American Manganese Inc (AMY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 77.8% as of October 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$20.04 Million minus total liabilities of CA$4.46 Million yields net assets of CA$15.58 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check how resilient are American Manganese Inc's assets to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
American Manganese Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2025)
This chart shows how American Manganese Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of October 2025, the index stands at 77.8%, representing net assets of CA$15.58 Million against total assets of CA$20.04 Million CAD. See working capital position of American Manganese Inc to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for American Manganese Inc (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for American Manganese Inc from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see American Manganese Inc (AMY) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 99.6% | CA$16.35 Million | CA$16.42 Million | CA$72.31K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 99.6% | CA$18.19 Million | CA$18.27 Million | CA$79.22K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2023 | 99.2% | CA$19.73 Million | CA$19.89 Million | CA$164.59K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 99.1% | CA$22.09 Million | CA$22.29 Million | CA$198.45K | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2021 | 92.7% | CA$6.90 Million | CA$7.44 Million | CA$545.27K | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2020 | 83.3% | CA$717.34K | CA$861.03K | CA$143.69K | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2019 | 95.8% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.07 Million | CA$45.09K | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2018 | 96.7% | CA$6.53 Million | CA$6.76 Million | CA$222.59K | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2017 | 93.5% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$5.85 Million | CA$382.05K | ▲ +11.5 pp |
| 2016 | 82.0% | CA$4.43 Million | CA$5.40 Million | CA$973.12K | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2015 | 84.6% | CA$4.96 Million | CA$5.86 Million | CA$904.78K | ▼ -7.8 pp |
| 2014 | 92.4% | CA$9.25 Million | CA$10.01 Million | CA$760.93K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2013 | 92.9% | CA$9.19 Million | CA$9.90 Million | CA$706.71K | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2012 | 95.5% | CA$11.46 Million | CA$12.00 Million | CA$536.96K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2011 | 97.4% | CA$14.46 Million | CA$14.84 Million | CA$384.58K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 97.3% | CA$4.52 Million | CA$4.64 Million | CA$123.95K | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2009 | 88.6% | CA$3.32 Million | CA$3.74 Million | CA$428.41K | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2008 | 86.2% | CA$2.81 Million | CA$3.26 Million | CA$449.67K | ▲ +9.7 pp |
| 2007 | 76.5% | CA$1.22 Million | CA$1.59 Million | CA$373.12K | ▲ +264.2 pp |
| 2006 | -187.7% | CA$-671.37K | CA$357.74K | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +3320.0 pp |
| 2005 | -3507.7% | CA$-923.83K | CA$26.34K | CA$950.16K | ▼ -2250.8 pp |
| 2004 | -1256.9% | CA$-797.13K | CA$63.42K | CA$860.55K | ▲ +36177.6 pp |
| 2003 | -37434.6% | CA$-729.97K | CA$1.95K | CA$731.92K | ▼ -14510.8 pp |
| 2002 | -22923.7% | CA$-676.71K | CA$2.95K | CA$679.66K | ▼ -16008.6 pp |
| 2001 | -6915.1% | CA$-632.66K | CA$9.15K | CA$641.81K | ▼ -6637.6 pp |
| 2000 | -277.5% | CA$-442.17K | CA$159.33K | CA$601.49K | ▼ -235.1 pp |
| 1999 | -42.5% | CA$-65.62K | CA$154.57K | CA$220.20K | ▼ -133.9 pp |
| 1998 | 91.4% | CA$1.56 Million | CA$1.71 Million | CA$146.28K | — |