BluMetric Environmental Inc (BLM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BluMetric Environmental Inc (BLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-10.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$21.35 Million) in one year. See BLM FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BluMetric Environmental Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BluMetric Environmental Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore BluMetric Environmental Inc (BLM) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BluMetric Environmental Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BluMetric Environmental Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BluMetric Environmental Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$1.63 Million | CA$21.35 Million | ▲ +3144.5% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$57.00K | CA$24.27 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-462.95K | CA$7.86 Million | ▼ -140.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$1.20 Million | CA$8.30 Million | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | CA$3.65 Million | CA$7.56 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$2.67 Million | CA$9.44 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | CA$2.06 Million | CA$6.86 Million | ▲ +360.2% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$9.29 Million | ▼ -191.2% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-330.65K | CA$8.37 Million | ▼ -2084.4% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$-19.66K | CA$10.87 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | CA$215.94K | CA$13.38 Million | ▼ -86.1% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CA$1.55 Million | CA$13.33 Million | ▲ +214.1% |
| 2012 | -0.10x | CA$-694.66K | CA$6.81 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | CA$-497.27K | CA$4.34 Million | ▼ -193.8% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$524.27K | CA$4.29 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$390.95K | CA$5.44 Million | ▲ +118.6% |
| 2008 | -0.39x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$3.95 Million | ▼ -263.6% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | CA$550.37K | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +290.3% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | CA$-275.42K | CA$2.22 Million | ▼ -552.7% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CA$-30.43K | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2004 | -0.36x | CA$-444.32K | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2003 | -0.27x | CA$-494.19K | CA$1.82 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2002 | -0.41x | CA$-536.26K | CA$1.29 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | CA$-451.35K | CA$1.18 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | -0.37x | CA$-479.58K | CA$1.31 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | CA$-200.00K | CA$800.00K | ▲ +25.0% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | CA$-300.00K | CA$900.00K | ▲ +79.2% |
| 1997 | -1.60x | CA$-800.00K | CA$500.00K | — |