BluMetric Environmental Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BluMetric Environmental Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. BluMetric Environmental Inc (BLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-10.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$21.35 Million) in one year. Check BluMetric Environmental Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of BluMetric Environmental Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of BluMetric Environmental Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for BluMetric Environmental Inc across 28 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of BluMetric Environmental Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
BluMetric Environmental Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
BluMetric Environmental Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BluMetric Environmental Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BLM operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$1.63 Million | CA$21.35 Million | ▲ +3144.5% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$57.00K | CA$24.27 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-462.95K | CA$7.86 Million | ▼ -140.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$1.20 Million | CA$8.30 Million | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | CA$3.65 Million | CA$7.56 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$2.67 Million | CA$9.44 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | CA$2.06 Million | CA$6.86 Million | ▲ +360.2% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$9.29 Million | ▼ -191.2% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-330.65K | CA$8.37 Million | ▼ -2084.4% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$-19.66K | CA$10.87 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | CA$215.94K | CA$13.38 Million | ▼ -86.1% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CA$1.55 Million | CA$13.33 Million | ▲ +214.1% |
| 2012 | -0.10x | CA$-694.66K | CA$6.81 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | CA$-497.27K | CA$4.34 Million | ▼ -193.8% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$524.27K | CA$4.29 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$390.95K | CA$5.44 Million | ▲ +118.6% |
| 2008 | -0.39x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$3.95 Million | ▼ -263.6% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | CA$550.37K | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +290.3% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | CA$-275.42K | CA$2.22 Million | ▼ -552.7% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CA$-30.43K | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2004 | -0.36x | CA$-444.32K | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2003 | -0.27x | CA$-494.19K | CA$1.82 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2002 | -0.41x | CA$-536.26K | CA$1.29 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | CA$-451.35K | CA$1.18 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | -0.37x | CA$-479.58K | CA$1.31 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | CA$-200.00K | CA$800.00K | ▲ +25.0% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | CA$-300.00K | CA$900.00K | ▲ +79.2% |
| 1997 | -1.60x | CA$-800.00K | CA$500.00K | — |