BluMetric Environmental Inc (BLM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BluMetric Environmental Inc (BLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-10.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$21.35 Million) in one year. See BluMetric Environmental Inc (BLM) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BluMetric Environmental Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BluMetric Environmental Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BluMetric Environmental Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BluMetric Environmental Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BluMetric Environmental Inc. Check BLM cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$1.63 Million | CA$21.35 Million | ▲ +3144.5% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$57.00K | CA$24.27 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-462.95K | CA$7.86 Million | ▼ -140.9% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$1.20 Million | CA$8.30 Million | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | CA$3.65 Million | CA$7.56 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$2.67 Million | CA$9.44 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | CA$2.06 Million | CA$6.86 Million | ▲ +360.2% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$9.29 Million | ▼ -191.2% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-330.65K | CA$8.37 Million | ▼ -2084.4% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$-19.66K | CA$10.87 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | CA$215.94K | CA$13.38 Million | ▼ -86.1% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CA$1.55 Million | CA$13.33 Million | ▲ +214.1% |
| 2012 | -0.10x | CA$-694.66K | CA$6.81 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | CA$-497.27K | CA$4.34 Million | ▼ -193.8% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$524.27K | CA$4.29 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$390.95K | CA$5.44 Million | ▲ +118.6% |
| 2008 | -0.39x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$3.95 Million | ▼ -263.6% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | CA$550.37K | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +290.3% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | CA$-275.42K | CA$2.22 Million | ▼ -552.7% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | CA$-30.43K | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2004 | -0.36x | CA$-444.32K | CA$1.24 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2003 | -0.27x | CA$-494.19K | CA$1.82 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2002 | -0.41x | CA$-536.26K | CA$1.29 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | CA$-451.35K | CA$1.18 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | -0.37x | CA$-479.58K | CA$1.31 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | CA$-200.00K | CA$800.00K | ▲ +25.0% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | CA$-300.00K | CA$900.00K | ▲ +79.2% |
| 1997 | -1.60x | CA$-800.00K | CA$500.00K | — |