Big Ridge Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Big Ridge Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Big Ridge Gold Corp (BRAU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.86x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-851.60K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$986.91K) in one year. Check Big Ridge Gold Corp earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Big Ridge Gold Corp (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Big Ridge Gold Corp from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Big Ridge Gold Corp across 24 annual periods. Check Big Ridge Gold Corp cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Big Ridge Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Big Ridge Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Big Ridge Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BRAU cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -6.76x | CA$-3.47 Million | CA$513.00K | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2023 | -6.85x | CA$-4.40 Million | CA$641.73K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2022 | -4.17x | CA$-9.32 Million | CA$2.23 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2021 | -4.99x | CA$-925.26K | CA$185.30K | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2020 | -7.92x | CA$-629.02K | CA$79.43K | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2019 | -5.05x | CA$-583.23K | CA$115.53K | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2018 | -6.58x | CA$-811.45K | CA$123.25K | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2017 | -5.33x | CA$-575.07K | CA$107.99K | ▼ -345.8% |
| 2016 | -1.19x | CA$-90.91K | CA$76.10K | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2015 | -14.54x | CA$-648.79K | CA$44.62K | ▼ -226.0% |
| 2014 | -4.46x | CA$-273.07K | CA$61.22K | ▼ -107.9% |
| 2013 | -2.15x | CA$-289.95K | CA$135.12K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2012 | -54.58x | CA$-2.90 Million | CA$53.10K | ▼ -1342.1% |
| 2011 | -3.78x | CA$-1.95 Million | CA$515.85K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2010 | -5.07x | CA$-596.92K | CA$117.63K | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2009 | -8.20x | CA$-539.01K | CA$65.71K | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2008 | -8.79x | CA$-901.14K | CA$102.57K | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2007 | -12.29x | CA$-684.92K | CA$55.72K | ▼ -202.2% |
| 2006 | -4.07x | CA$-619.86K | CA$152.37K | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2005 | -5.61x | CA$-661.99K | CA$118.05K | ▼ -8185.0% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | CA$-28.30K | CA$418.20K | ▲ +89.6% |
| 2003 | -0.65x | CA$-165.40K | CA$253.59K | ▼ -7571.4% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | CA$2.98K | CA$341.94K | ▲ +105.6% |
| 2001 | -0.16x | CA$-39.99K | CA$256.46K | — |