Big Ridge Gold Corp (BRAU) — Net Asset Quality Index
Big Ridge Gold Corp (BRAU) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 91.6% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$11.68 Million minus total liabilities of CA$986.91K yields net assets of CA$10.69 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read how much debt does Big Ridge Gold Corp carry for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Big Ridge Gold Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Big Ridge Gold Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 91.6%, representing net assets of CA$10.69 Million against total assets of CA$11.68 Million CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Big Ridge Gold Corp market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Big Ridge Gold Corp (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Big Ridge Gold Corp from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Big Ridge Gold Corp strategic capital allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 92.1% | CA$5.96 Million | CA$6.48 Million | CA$513.00K | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2023 | 88.2% | CA$4.79 Million | CA$5.43 Million | CA$641.73K | ▲ +24.0 pp |
| 2022 | 64.1% | CA$4.00 Million | CA$6.23 Million | CA$2.23 Million | ▼ -34.4 pp |
| 2021 | 98.6% | CA$12.77 Million | CA$12.95 Million | CA$185.30K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2020 | 98.3% | CA$4.73 Million | CA$4.81 Million | CA$79.43K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2019 | 96.5% | CA$3.16 Million | CA$3.28 Million | CA$115.53K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 96.8% | CA$3.68 Million | CA$3.80 Million | CA$123.25K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2017 | 97.3% | CA$3.84 Million | CA$3.94 Million | CA$107.99K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2016 | 96.8% | CA$2.34 Million | CA$2.42 Million | CA$76.10K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2015 | 98.3% | CA$2.66 Million | CA$2.70 Million | CA$44.62K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 98.3% | CA$3.59 Million | CA$3.66 Million | CA$61.22K | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2013 | 96.7% | CA$3.95 Million | CA$4.09 Million | CA$135.12K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2012 | 98.9% | CA$4.83 Million | CA$4.89 Million | CA$53.10K | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2011 | 91.2% | CA$5.32 Million | CA$5.83 Million | CA$515.85K | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2010 | 98.3% | CA$6.79 Million | CA$6.91 Million | CA$117.63K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 99.0% | CA$6.64 Million | CA$6.71 Million | CA$65.71K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 98.8% | CA$8.48 Million | CA$8.58 Million | CA$102.57K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 98.9% | CA$5.07 Million | CA$5.13 Million | CA$55.72K | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2006 | 96.8% | CA$4.57 Million | CA$4.72 Million | CA$152.37K | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2005 | 97.0% | CA$3.85 Million | CA$3.97 Million | CA$118.05K | ▲ +96.3 pp |
| 2004 | 0.7% | CA$2.84K | CA$421.04K | CA$418.20K | ▼ -66.8 pp |
| 2003 | 67.5% | CA$527.01K | CA$780.60K | CA$253.59K | ▲ +19.4 pp |
| 2002 | 48.1% | CA$316.77K | CA$658.71K | CA$341.94K | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2001 | 61.2% | CA$404.25K | CA$660.70K | CA$256.46K | — |