Big Ridge Gold Corp (BRAU) — Net Asset Quality Index
Big Ridge Gold Corp (BRAU) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 91.6% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$11.68 Million minus total liabilities of CA$986.91K yields net assets of CA$10.69 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Big Ridge Gold Corp defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Big Ridge Gold Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Big Ridge Gold Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 91.6%, representing net assets of CA$10.69 Million against total assets of CA$11.68 Million CAD. Explore Big Ridge Gold Corp (BRAU) cash conversion ratio to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Big Ridge Gold Corp (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Big Ridge Gold Corp from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see BRAU company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 92.1% | CA$5.96 Million | CA$6.48 Million | CA$513.00K | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2023 | 88.2% | CA$4.79 Million | CA$5.43 Million | CA$641.73K | ▲ +24.0 pp |
| 2022 | 64.1% | CA$4.00 Million | CA$6.23 Million | CA$2.23 Million | ▼ -34.4 pp |
| 2021 | 98.6% | CA$12.77 Million | CA$12.95 Million | CA$185.30K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2020 | 98.3% | CA$4.73 Million | CA$4.81 Million | CA$79.43K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2019 | 96.5% | CA$3.16 Million | CA$3.28 Million | CA$115.53K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 96.8% | CA$3.68 Million | CA$3.80 Million | CA$123.25K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2017 | 97.3% | CA$3.84 Million | CA$3.94 Million | CA$107.99K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2016 | 96.8% | CA$2.34 Million | CA$2.42 Million | CA$76.10K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2015 | 98.3% | CA$2.66 Million | CA$2.70 Million | CA$44.62K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 98.3% | CA$3.59 Million | CA$3.66 Million | CA$61.22K | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2013 | 96.7% | CA$3.95 Million | CA$4.09 Million | CA$135.12K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2012 | 98.9% | CA$4.83 Million | CA$4.89 Million | CA$53.10K | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2011 | 91.2% | CA$5.32 Million | CA$5.83 Million | CA$515.85K | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2010 | 98.3% | CA$6.79 Million | CA$6.91 Million | CA$117.63K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 99.0% | CA$6.64 Million | CA$6.71 Million | CA$65.71K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 98.8% | CA$8.48 Million | CA$8.58 Million | CA$102.57K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 98.9% | CA$5.07 Million | CA$5.13 Million | CA$55.72K | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2006 | 96.8% | CA$4.57 Million | CA$4.72 Million | CA$152.37K | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2005 | 97.0% | CA$3.85 Million | CA$3.97 Million | CA$118.05K | ▲ +96.3 pp |
| 2004 | 0.7% | CA$2.84K | CA$421.04K | CA$418.20K | ▼ -66.8 pp |
| 2003 | 67.5% | CA$527.01K | CA$780.60K | CA$253.59K | ▲ +19.4 pp |
| 2002 | 48.1% | CA$316.77K | CA$658.71K | CA$341.94K | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2001 | 61.2% | CA$404.25K | CA$660.70K | CA$256.46K | — |