Blackrock Silver Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Blackrock Silver Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Blackrock Silver Corp (BRC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.76x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-5.38 Million could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$1.95 Million) in one year. Check Blackrock Silver Corp (BRC) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Blackrock Silver Corp (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Blackrock Silver Corp from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Blackrock Silver Corp across 26 annual periods. Check Blackrock Silver Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Blackrock Silver Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Blackrock Silver Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Blackrock Silver Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Blackrock Silver Corp cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -22.93x | CA$-21.24 Million | CA$926.35K | ▼ -232.9% |
| 2024 | -6.89x | CA$-10.21 Million | CA$1.48 Million | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2023 | -16.80x | CA$-6.45 Million | CA$384.00K | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2022 | -16.95x | CA$-17.47 Million | CA$1.03 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2021 | -16.42x | CA$-24.65 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -255.3% |
| 2020 | -4.62x | CA$-6.99 Million | CA$1.51 Million | ▼ -139.9% |
| 2019 | -1.93x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$575.74K | ▲ +60.9% |
| 2018 | -4.92x | CA$-911.97K | CA$185.30K | ▼ -155.9% |
| 2017 | -1.92x | CA$-292.88K | CA$152.28K | ▼ -244.3% |
| 2016 | -0.56x | CA$-529.88K | CA$948.55K | ▼ -726.2% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | CA$-60.47K | CA$894.33K | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | CA$-83.43K | CA$841.96K | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2013 | -0.20x | CA$-149.61K | CA$762.82K | ▼ -172.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | CA$-66.16K | CA$918.43K | ▼ -147.7% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | CA$-22.13K | CA$761.10K | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | CA$-23.65K | CA$479.41K | ▼ -170.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$69.30K | CA$994.62K | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | CA$131.86K | CA$434.92K | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2007 | 0.54x | CA$166.64K | CA$307.28K | ▲ +775.4% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$47.72K | CA$770.33K | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | CA$114.56K | CA$1.80 Million | ▲ +382.1% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | CA$-33.73K | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -105.9% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | CA$11.18K | CA$29.25K | ▲ +107.8% |
| 2002 | -4.91x | CA$-44.24K | CA$9.01K | ▼ -587.9% |
| 2001 | -0.71x | CA$-2.73K | CA$3.83K | ▲ +93.6% |
| 2000 | -11.19x | CA$-63.17K | CA$5.64K | — |