CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$38.06K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$319.77K) in one year. Check CANX capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CANEX Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CANEX Metals Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore CANEX Metals Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CANEX Metals Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CANEX Metals Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of CANEX Metals Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.79x | CA$-252.24K | CA$319.77K | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2024 | -2.62x | CA$-251.90K | CA$96.15K | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2023 | -4.74x | CA$-465.71K | CA$98.25K | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2022 | -3.64x | CA$-528.57K | CA$145.09K | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2021 | -2.06x | CA$-481.98K | CA$233.70K | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2020 | -3.53x | CA$-464.03K | CA$131.39K | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2019 | -2.69x | CA$-166.97K | CA$62.03K | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2018 | -3.39x | CA$-164.05K | CA$48.45K | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2017 | -2.54x | CA$-136.43K | CA$53.68K | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2016 | -2.99x | CA$-81.94K | CA$27.41K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2015 | -4.27x | CA$-106.88K | CA$25.01K | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2014 | -3.55x | CA$-132.03K | CA$37.17K | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2013 | -1.95x | CA$-154.59K | CA$79.31K | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2012 | -1.83x | CA$-183.56K | CA$100.07K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2011 | -2.13x | CA$-261.92K | CA$122.81K | ▼ -156.4% |
| 2010 | -0.83x | CA$-240.58K | CA$289.28K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2009 | -1.19x | CA$-246.72K | CA$207.27K | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2008 | -3.11x | CA$-216.96K | CA$69.66K | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2007 | -2.26x | CA$-150.48K | CA$66.56K | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2006 | -5.19x | CA$-109.05K | CA$21.01K | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2005 | -3.80x | CA$-71.81K | CA$18.92K | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2004 | -44.78x | CA$-75.50K | CA$1.69K | ▼ -363.5% |
| 2003 | -9.66x | CA$-108.31K | CA$11.21K | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2002 | -25.67x | CA$-149.02K | CA$5.80K | ▼ -326.9% |
| 2001 | -6.01x | CA$-85.19K | CA$14.17K | ▼ -141.3% |
| 2000 | -2.49x | CA$-52.39K | CA$21.02K | ▼ -143.1% |
| 1999 | 5.78x | CA$64.47K | CA$11.15K | ▲ +538.0% |
| 1998 | 0.91x | CA$64.47K | CA$71.14K | ▲ +109.0% |
| 1997 | -10.10x | CA$-369.15K | CA$36.55K | ▼ -7997.2% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | CA$35.24K | CA$275.54K | — |