CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$38.06K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$319.77K) in one year. See CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CANEX Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CANEX Metals Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore CANX shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CANEX Metals Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CANEX Metals Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CANEX Metals Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.79x | CA$-252.24K | CA$319.77K | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2024 | -2.62x | CA$-251.90K | CA$96.15K | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2023 | -4.74x | CA$-465.71K | CA$98.25K | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2022 | -3.64x | CA$-528.57K | CA$145.09K | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2021 | -2.06x | CA$-481.98K | CA$233.70K | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2020 | -3.53x | CA$-464.03K | CA$131.39K | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2019 | -2.69x | CA$-166.97K | CA$62.03K | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2018 | -3.39x | CA$-164.05K | CA$48.45K | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2017 | -2.54x | CA$-136.43K | CA$53.68K | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2016 | -2.99x | CA$-81.94K | CA$27.41K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2015 | -4.27x | CA$-106.88K | CA$25.01K | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2014 | -3.55x | CA$-132.03K | CA$37.17K | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2013 | -1.95x | CA$-154.59K | CA$79.31K | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2012 | -1.83x | CA$-183.56K | CA$100.07K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2011 | -2.13x | CA$-261.92K | CA$122.81K | ▼ -156.4% |
| 2010 | -0.83x | CA$-240.58K | CA$289.28K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2009 | -1.19x | CA$-246.72K | CA$207.27K | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2008 | -3.11x | CA$-216.96K | CA$69.66K | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2007 | -2.26x | CA$-150.48K | CA$66.56K | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2006 | -5.19x | CA$-109.05K | CA$21.01K | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2005 | -3.80x | CA$-71.81K | CA$18.92K | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2004 | -44.78x | CA$-75.50K | CA$1.69K | ▼ -363.5% |
| 2003 | -9.66x | CA$-108.31K | CA$11.21K | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2002 | -25.67x | CA$-149.02K | CA$5.80K | ▼ -326.9% |
| 2001 | -6.01x | CA$-85.19K | CA$14.17K | ▼ -141.3% |
| 2000 | -2.49x | CA$-52.39K | CA$21.02K | ▼ -143.1% |
| 1999 | 5.78x | CA$64.47K | CA$11.15K | ▲ +538.0% |
| 1998 | 0.91x | CA$64.47K | CA$71.14K | ▲ +109.0% |
| 1997 | -10.10x | CA$-369.15K | CA$36.55K | ▼ -7997.2% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | CA$35.24K | CA$275.54K | — |