CANEX Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CANEX Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$38.06K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$319.77K) in one year. Check CANEX Metals Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CANEX Metals Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CANEX Metals Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for CANEX Metals Inc across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of CANEX Metals Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CANEX Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
CANEX Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CANEX Metals Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of CANEX Metals Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.79x | CA$-252.24K | CA$319.77K | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2024 | -2.62x | CA$-251.90K | CA$96.15K | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2023 | -4.74x | CA$-465.71K | CA$98.25K | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2022 | -3.64x | CA$-528.57K | CA$145.09K | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2021 | -2.06x | CA$-481.98K | CA$233.70K | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2020 | -3.53x | CA$-464.03K | CA$131.39K | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2019 | -2.69x | CA$-166.97K | CA$62.03K | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2018 | -3.39x | CA$-164.05K | CA$48.45K | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2017 | -2.54x | CA$-136.43K | CA$53.68K | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2016 | -2.99x | CA$-81.94K | CA$27.41K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2015 | -4.27x | CA$-106.88K | CA$25.01K | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2014 | -3.55x | CA$-132.03K | CA$37.17K | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2013 | -1.95x | CA$-154.59K | CA$79.31K | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2012 | -1.83x | CA$-183.56K | CA$100.07K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2011 | -2.13x | CA$-261.92K | CA$122.81K | ▼ -156.4% |
| 2010 | -0.83x | CA$-240.58K | CA$289.28K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2009 | -1.19x | CA$-246.72K | CA$207.27K | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2008 | -3.11x | CA$-216.96K | CA$69.66K | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2007 | -2.26x | CA$-150.48K | CA$66.56K | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2006 | -5.19x | CA$-109.05K | CA$21.01K | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2005 | -3.80x | CA$-71.81K | CA$18.92K | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2004 | -44.78x | CA$-75.50K | CA$1.69K | ▼ -363.5% |
| 2003 | -9.66x | CA$-108.31K | CA$11.21K | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2002 | -25.67x | CA$-149.02K | CA$5.80K | ▼ -326.9% |
| 2001 | -6.01x | CA$-85.19K | CA$14.17K | ▼ -141.3% |
| 2000 | -2.49x | CA$-52.39K | CA$21.02K | ▼ -143.1% |
| 1999 | 5.78x | CA$64.47K | CA$11.15K | ▲ +538.0% |
| 1998 | 0.91x | CA$64.47K | CA$71.14K | ▲ +109.0% |
| 1997 | -10.10x | CA$-369.15K | CA$36.55K | ▼ -7997.2% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | CA$35.24K | CA$275.54K | — |