CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) — Net Asset Quality Index
CANEX Metals Inc (CANX) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 95.8% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$7.60 Million minus total liabilities of CA$319.77K yields net assets of CA$7.28 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check how resilient are CANEX Metals Inc's assets to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
CANEX Metals Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1996–2025)
This chart shows how CANEX Metals Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 30 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of September 2025, the index stands at 95.8%, representing net assets of CA$7.28 Million against total assets of CA$7.60 Million CAD. See working capital to net assets of CANEX Metals Inc to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for CANEX Metals Inc (1996–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for CANEX Metals Inc from 1996 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of CANEX Metals Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 95.8% | CA$7.28 Million | CA$7.60 Million | CA$319.77K | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2024 | 98.4% | CA$5.87 Million | CA$5.97 Million | CA$96.15K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 98.3% | CA$5.83 Million | CA$5.92 Million | CA$98.25K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2022 | 97.5% | CA$5.62 Million | CA$5.77 Million | CA$145.09K | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2021 | 94.0% | CA$3.65 Million | CA$3.88 Million | CA$233.70K | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2020 | 94.7% | CA$2.37 Million | CA$2.50 Million | CA$131.39K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2019 | 94.4% | CA$1.05 Million | CA$1.11 Million | CA$62.03K | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2018 | 93.4% | CA$682.35K | CA$730.80K | CA$48.45K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2017 | 92.1% | CA$626.65K | CA$680.34K | CA$53.68K | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2016 | 95.8% | CA$628.15K | CA$655.56K | CA$27.41K | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2015 | 93.0% | CA$334.64K | CA$359.65K | CA$25.01K | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2014 | 91.0% | CA$374.23K | CA$411.40K | CA$37.17K | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2013 | 89.5% | CA$676.13K | CA$755.44K | CA$79.31K | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2012 | 94.5% | CA$1.71 Million | CA$1.81 Million | CA$100.07K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2011 | 97.2% | CA$4.32 Million | CA$4.45 Million | CA$122.81K | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2010 | 92.5% | CA$3.56 Million | CA$3.85 Million | CA$289.28K | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 91.7% | CA$2.30 Million | CA$2.51 Million | CA$207.27K | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2008 | 95.3% | CA$1.43 Million | CA$1.50 Million | CA$69.66K | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2007 | 93.6% | CA$973.97K | CA$1.04 Million | CA$66.56K | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2006 | 96.6% | CA$600.61K | CA$621.62K | CA$21.01K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2005 | 97.3% | CA$674.00K | CA$692.92K | CA$18.92K | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2004 | 96.2% | CA$43.18K | CA$44.86K | CA$1.69K | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2003 | 99.6% | CA$2.72 Million | CA$2.74 Million | CA$11.21K | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2002 | 99.8% | CA$2.91 Million | CA$2.91 Million | CA$5.80K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2001 | 99.5% | CA$3.01 Million | CA$3.02 Million | CA$14.17K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2000 | 99.4% | CA$3.22 Million | CA$3.24 Million | CA$21.02K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 1999 | 99.7% | CA$4.12 Million | CA$4.13 Million | CA$11.15K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 1998 | 98.5% | CA$4.76 Million | CA$4.83 Million | CA$71.14K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 1997 | 98.9% | CA$3.44 Million | CA$3.48 Million | CA$36.55K | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 1996 | 90.9% | CA$2.75 Million | CA$3.02 Million | CA$275.54K | — |