Copper Lake Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Copper Lake Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Copper Lake Resources Ltd (CPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-53.06K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.99 Million) in one year. Check CPL cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Copper Lake Resources Ltd (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Copper Lake Resources Ltd from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Copper Lake Resources Ltd across 25 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Copper Lake Resources Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Copper Lake Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Copper Lake Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Copper Lake Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CPL cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | CA$-102.28K | CA$1.83 Million | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2024 | -0.57x | CA$-854.64K | CA$1.49 Million | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2023 | -3.06x | CA$-1.86 Million | CA$608.65K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2022 | -9.51x | CA$-2.33 Million | CA$244.73K | ▼ -274.8% |
| 2021 | -2.54x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$490.70K | ▼ -161.1% |
| 2020 | -0.97x | CA$-470.10K | CA$483.81K | ▼ -655.3% |
| 2019 | -0.13x | CA$-65.61K | CA$510.01K | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2018 | -2.03x | CA$-736.97K | CA$363.05K | ▼ -476.2% |
| 2017 | -0.35x | CA$-139.49K | CA$395.96K | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2016 | -0.42x | CA$-297.56K | CA$700.26K | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2015 | -0.26x | CA$-208.49K | CA$802.79K | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-91.01K | CA$482.38K | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2013 | -1.30x | CA$-488.88K | CA$376.02K | ▲ +76.7% |
| 2012 | -5.57x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$200.11K | ▲ +72.9% |
| 2011 | -20.53x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$60.83K | ▼ -2127.9% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | CA$-351.34K | CA$381.31K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2009 | -4.50x | CA$-351.28K | CA$78.03K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2008 | -11.37x | CA$-262.53K | CA$23.10K | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2007 | -11.20x | CA$-100.81K | CA$9.00K | ▼ -4762.5% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | CA$-31.57K | CA$137.06K | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2005 | -0.21x | CA$-21.29K | CA$101.54K | ▼ -268.7% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | CA$-4.99K | CA$87.81K | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2003 | -10.71x | CA$-93.55K | CA$8.73K | ▼ -175.5% |
| 2002 | -3.89x | CA$-68.40K | CA$17.59K | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2001 | -2.11x | CA$-46.58K | CA$22.12K | — |