Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-424.96K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.15 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Cymat Technologies Ltd. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cymat Technologies Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cymat Technologies Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore CYM year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cymat Technologies Ltd. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cymat Technologies Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cymat Technologies Ltd. market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.21x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$7.49 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | CA$-2.23 Million | CA$6.78 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2023 | -0.52x | CA$-2.46 Million | CA$4.77 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2022 | -1.13x | CA$-4.32 Million | CA$3.83 Million | ▼ -1065.6% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | CA$432.92K | CA$3.71 Million | ▲ +124.1% |
| 2020 | -0.48x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$2.75 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2019 | -0.28x | CA$-471.36K | CA$1.68 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2018 | -0.48x | CA$-763.48K | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -450.7% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | CA$-362.46K | CA$4.17 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-517.29K | CA$4.15 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2015 | -0.42x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$2.97 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-429.77K | CA$2.30 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2013 | -1.14x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$982.08K | ▼ -331.1% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | CA$-710.61K | CA$2.69 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2011 | -0.76x | CA$-2.58 Million | CA$3.38 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2010 | -1.63x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2009 | -1.06x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2008 | -2.13x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$838.95K | ▼ -119.0% |
| 2007 | -0.97x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$2.50 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2006 | -4.08x | CA$-3.31 Million | CA$810.66K | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2005 | -3.27x | CA$-3.13 Million | CA$957.70K | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2004 | -8.37x | CA$-6.41 Million | CA$764.91K | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2003 | -5.93x | CA$-8.07 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2002 | -2.92x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2001 | -1.85x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2000 | -0.95x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1999 | -0.87x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▼ -1193.5% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | CA$156.66K | CA$1.96 Million | — |