Cymat Technologies Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cymat Technologies Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-424.96K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.15 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Cymat Technologies Ltd. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cymat Technologies Ltd. (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cymat Technologies Ltd. from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cymat Technologies Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Check Cymat Technologies Ltd. investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cymat Technologies Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Cymat Technologies Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cymat Technologies Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Cymat Technologies Ltd. cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.21x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$7.49 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | CA$-2.23 Million | CA$6.78 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2023 | -0.52x | CA$-2.46 Million | CA$4.77 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2022 | -1.13x | CA$-4.32 Million | CA$3.83 Million | ▼ -1065.6% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | CA$432.92K | CA$3.71 Million | ▲ +124.1% |
| 2020 | -0.48x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$2.75 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2019 | -0.28x | CA$-471.36K | CA$1.68 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2018 | -0.48x | CA$-763.48K | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -450.7% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | CA$-362.46K | CA$4.17 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-517.29K | CA$4.15 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2015 | -0.42x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$2.97 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-429.77K | CA$2.30 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2013 | -1.14x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$982.08K | ▼ -331.1% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | CA$-710.61K | CA$2.69 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2011 | -0.76x | CA$-2.58 Million | CA$3.38 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2010 | -1.63x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2009 | -1.06x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2008 | -2.13x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$838.95K | ▼ -119.0% |
| 2007 | -0.97x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$2.50 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2006 | -4.08x | CA$-3.31 Million | CA$810.66K | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2005 | -3.27x | CA$-3.13 Million | CA$957.70K | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2004 | -8.37x | CA$-6.41 Million | CA$764.91K | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2003 | -5.93x | CA$-8.07 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2002 | -2.92x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2001 | -1.85x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2000 | -0.95x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1999 | -0.87x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▼ -1193.5% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | CA$156.66K | CA$1.96 Million | — |