Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-424.96K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.15 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Cymat Technologies Ltd. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cymat Technologies Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cymat Technologies Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cymat Technologies Ltd. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cymat Technologies Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CYM market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.21x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$7.49 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | CA$-2.23 Million | CA$6.78 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2023 | -0.52x | CA$-2.46 Million | CA$4.77 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2022 | -1.13x | CA$-4.32 Million | CA$3.83 Million | ▼ -1065.6% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | CA$432.92K | CA$3.71 Million | ▲ +124.1% |
| 2020 | -0.48x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$2.75 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2019 | -0.28x | CA$-471.36K | CA$1.68 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2018 | -0.48x | CA$-763.48K | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -450.7% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | CA$-362.46K | CA$4.17 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | CA$-517.29K | CA$4.15 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2015 | -0.42x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$2.97 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | CA$-429.77K | CA$2.30 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2013 | -1.14x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$982.08K | ▼ -331.1% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | CA$-710.61K | CA$2.69 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2011 | -0.76x | CA$-2.58 Million | CA$3.38 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2010 | -1.63x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2009 | -1.06x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2008 | -2.13x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$838.95K | ▼ -119.0% |
| 2007 | -0.97x | CA$-2.43 Million | CA$2.50 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2006 | -4.08x | CA$-3.31 Million | CA$810.66K | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2005 | -3.27x | CA$-3.13 Million | CA$957.70K | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2004 | -8.37x | CA$-6.41 Million | CA$764.91K | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2003 | -5.93x | CA$-8.07 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2002 | -2.92x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2001 | -1.85x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2000 | -0.95x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1999 | -0.87x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▼ -1193.5% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | CA$156.66K | CA$1.96 Million | — |