Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of January 2023. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$252.28K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See CYM net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Cymat Technologies Ltd. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2022)
This chart shows how Cymat Technologies Ltd.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 1999 to 2022. As of January 2023, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$252.28K with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. Also explore CYM shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Cymat Technologies Ltd. (1999–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Cymat Technologies Ltd. from 1999 to 2022, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Cymat Technologies Ltd. (CYM) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$2.34 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$6.17 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$2.88 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$6.58 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$95.36K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.69 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$314.48K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +135.1 pp |
| 2011 | -35.1% | CA$2.82 Million | CA$3.81 Million | CA$6.20 Million | ▼ -66.3 pp |
| 2010 | 31.2% | CA$7.62 Million | CA$5.24 Million | CA$9.29 Million | ▲ +10.7 pp |
| 2009 | 20.6% | CA$8.42 Million | CA$6.68 Million | CA$10.71 Million | ▼ -8.8 pp |
| 2008 | 29.4% | CA$11.53 Million | CA$8.14 Million | CA$12.37 Million | ▲ +13.7 pp |
| 2007 | 15.7% | CA$11.38 Million | CA$9.59 Million | CA$13.88 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2006 | 17.5% | CA$13.39 Million | CA$11.04 Million | CA$14.20 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2005 | 23.5% | CA$16.33 Million | CA$12.50 Million | CA$17.28 Million | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2004 | 28.2% | CA$19.42 Million | CA$13.95 Million | CA$20.19 Million | ▼ -15.9 pp |
| 2003 | 44.1% | CA$27.55 Million | CA$15.40 Million | CA$28.91 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2002 | 42.9% | CA$29.49 Million | CA$16.86 Million | CA$31.21 Million | ▲ +32.7 pp |
| 2001 | 10.1% | CA$20.37 Million | CA$18.31 Million | CA$21.78 Million | ▼ -84.5 pp |
| 2000 | 94.6% | CA$3.83 Million | CA$205.90K | CA$5.25 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$975.67K | CA$0.00 | CA$2.31 Million | — |