District Metals Corp (DMX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
District Metals Corp (DMX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.08x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-533.33K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$493.27K) in one year. Check DMX total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
District Metals Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for District Metals Corp across 25 annual periods. Also explore District Metals Corp asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for District Metals Corp (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for District Metals Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see District Metals Corp stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.52x | CA$-2.82 Million | CA$801.44K | ▼ -513.4% |
| 2024 | -0.57x | CA$-698.05K | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2023 | -7.12x | CA$-848.43K | CA$119.24K | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2022 | -3.73x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$294.20K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2021 | -3.15x | CA$-1.87 Million | CA$592.60K | ▼ -122.3% |
| 2020 | -1.42x | CA$-372.58K | CA$262.75K | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2019 | -3.24x | CA$-385.01K | CA$118.77K | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2018 | -7.95x | CA$-127.02K | CA$15.97K | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2017 | -7.38x | CA$-242.63K | CA$32.86K | ▼ -3285.5% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | CA$-42.08K | CA$192.94K | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2015 | -9.65x | CA$-727.97K | CA$75.42K | ▼ -652.7% |
| 2014 | -1.28x | CA$-703.50K | CA$548.62K | ▲ +91.2% |
| 2013 | -14.53x | CA$-7.90 Million | CA$543.59K | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2012 | -10.12x | CA$-6.25 Million | CA$617.43K | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2011 | -12.27x | CA$-3.40 Million | CA$276.78K | ▼ -4759.3% |
| 2010 | -0.25x | CA$-626.70K | CA$2.48 Million | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | CA$-588.63K | CA$3.06 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2008 | -0.97x | CA$-942.15K | CA$974.14K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2007 | -5.31x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$242.88K | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2006 | -8.38x | CA$-969.05K | CA$115.63K | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2005 | -6.48x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$191.25K | ▼ -123.6% |
| 2004 | -2.90x | CA$-707.78K | CA$244.35K | ▼ -141.2% |
| 2003 | -1.20x | CA$-296.81K | CA$247.14K | ▼ -308.1% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | CA$-123.37K | CA$419.18K | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2001 | -1.46x | CA$-238.20K | CA$162.98K | — |