Emerita Resources Corp (EMO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.11x

Emerita Resources Corp (EMO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-995.03K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$9.19 Million) in one year. See Emerita Resources Corp free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.11x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CA$-995.03K
CAD

Total Liabilities

CA$9.19 Million
CAD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Emerita Resources Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Emerita Resources Corp across 15 annual periods. Also explore Emerita Resources Corp (EMO) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Emerita Resources Corp (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Emerita Resources Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Emerita Resources Corp market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CAD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.51x CA$-4.70 Million CA$9.19 Million ▼ -101.4%
2024 -0.25x CA$-2.05 Million CA$8.09 Million ▲ +98.1%
2023 -13.36x CA$-21.07 Million CA$1.58 Million ▼ -100.1%
2022 -6.68x CA$-12.29 Million CA$1.84 Million ▼ -88.0%
2021 -3.55x CA$-4.28 Million CA$1.21 Million ▼ -259.6%
2020 -0.99x CA$-1.55 Million CA$1.57 Million ▼ -38.0%
2019 -0.72x CA$-1.52 Million CA$2.12 Million ▲ +34.6%
2018 -1.10x CA$-2.24 Million CA$2.05 Million ▼ -123.0%
2017 -0.49x CA$-1.04 Million CA$2.12 Million ▲ +19.2%
2016 -0.61x CA$-900.53K CA$1.48 Million ▲ +46.4%
2015 -1.13x CA$-1.29 Million CA$1.14 Million ▲ +74.6%
2014 -4.46x CA$-1.53 Million CA$342.19K ▲ +29.1%
2013 -6.29x CA$-1.04 Million CA$165.29K ▼ -298.5%
2012 3.17x CA$102.38K CA$32.33K ▲ +249.7%
2011 -2.12x CA$-43.15K CA$20.40K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.