Emergent Metals Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Emergent Metals Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Emergent Metals Corp (EMR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-50.60K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.51 Million) in one year. Check Emergent Metals Corp (EMR) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Emergent Metals Corp (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Emergent Metals Corp from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Emergent Metals Corp across 28 annual periods. Check Emergent Metals Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Emergent Metals Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Emergent Metals Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Emergent Metals Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EMR cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.42x | CA$-963.98K | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2023 | -0.57x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$1.93 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2021 | -1.28x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2020 | -0.88x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$2.76 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2019 | -1.51x | CA$-2.30 Million | CA$1.52 Million | ▼ -94.1% |
| 2018 | -0.78x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$1.31 Million | ▼ -617.7% |
| 2017 | -0.11x | CA$-54.09K | CA$500.13K | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2016 | -0.39x | CA$-334.46K | CA$868.02K | ▼ -882.4% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | CA$-36.91K | CA$941.10K | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | CA$-158.88K | CA$760.68K | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2013 | -1.18x | CA$-792.60K | CA$671.06K | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2012 | -0.94x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2011 | -1.24x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$1.54 Million | ▲ +60.6% |
| 2010 | -3.15x | CA$-1.87 Million | CA$592.40K | ▼ -1065.6% |
| 2009 | -0.27x | CA$-717.66K | CA$2.65 Million | ▲ +92.5% |
| 2008 | -3.63x | CA$-4.52 Million | CA$1.25 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2007 | -3.34x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$1.49 Million | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2006 | -4.62x | CA$-5.12 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2005 | -3.77x | CA$-4.58 Million | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2004 | -4.56x | CA$-4.73 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -164.5% |
| 2003 | -1.72x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$746.72K | ▼ -195.9% |
| 2002 | -0.58x | CA$-339.86K | CA$583.18K | ▼ -1255.2% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$43.99K | CA$872.00K | ▼ -87.1% |
| 2000 | 0.39x | CA$376.89K | CA$965.68K | ▲ +2060.4% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | CA$-16.55K | CA$831.38K | ▲ +87.8% |
| 1998 | -0.16x | CA$-121.39K | CA$744.40K | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1997 | -5.31x | CA$-955.18K | CA$179.75K | — |