Emergent Metals Corp (EMR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Emergent Metals Corp (EMR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-50.60K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.51 Million) in one year. See EMR FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Emergent Metals Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Emergent Metals Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Emergent Metals Corp to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Emergent Metals Corp (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Emergent Metals Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Emergent Metals Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.42x | CA$-963.98K | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2023 | -0.57x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$1.93 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2021 | -1.28x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2020 | -0.88x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$2.76 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2019 | -1.51x | CA$-2.30 Million | CA$1.52 Million | ▼ -94.1% |
| 2018 | -0.78x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$1.31 Million | ▼ -617.7% |
| 2017 | -0.11x | CA$-54.09K | CA$500.13K | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2016 | -0.39x | CA$-334.46K | CA$868.02K | ▼ -882.4% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | CA$-36.91K | CA$941.10K | ▲ +81.2% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | CA$-158.88K | CA$760.68K | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2013 | -1.18x | CA$-792.60K | CA$671.06K | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2012 | -0.94x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2011 | -1.24x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$1.54 Million | ▲ +60.6% |
| 2010 | -3.15x | CA$-1.87 Million | CA$592.40K | ▼ -1065.6% |
| 2009 | -0.27x | CA$-717.66K | CA$2.65 Million | ▲ +92.5% |
| 2008 | -3.63x | CA$-4.52 Million | CA$1.25 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2007 | -3.34x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$1.49 Million | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2006 | -4.62x | CA$-5.12 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2005 | -3.77x | CA$-4.58 Million | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2004 | -4.56x | CA$-4.73 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -164.5% |
| 2003 | -1.72x | CA$-1.29 Million | CA$746.72K | ▼ -195.9% |
| 2002 | -0.58x | CA$-339.86K | CA$583.18K | ▼ -1255.2% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$43.99K | CA$872.00K | ▼ -87.1% |
| 2000 | 0.39x | CA$376.89K | CA$965.68K | ▲ +2060.4% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | CA$-16.55K | CA$831.38K | ▲ +87.8% |
| 1998 | -0.16x | CA$-121.39K | CA$744.40K | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1997 | -5.31x | CA$-955.18K | CA$179.75K | — |