Finlay Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Finlay Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Finlay Minerals Ltd (FYL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$428.18K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.96 Million) in one year. Check FYL cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Finlay Minerals Ltd (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Finlay Minerals Ltd from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Finlay Minerals Ltd across 24 annual periods. Check Finlay Minerals Ltd (FYL) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Finlay Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Finlay Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Finlay Minerals Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FYL operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.19x | CA$-300.90K | CA$1.62 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | CA$-291.10K | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2022 | -0.23x | CA$-405.72K | CA$1.77 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2021 | -0.23x | CA$-446.86K | CA$1.92 Million | ▼ -192.4% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | CA$-131.81K | CA$1.66 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | CA$-115.75K | CA$1.73 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2018 | -0.07x | CA$-104.33K | CA$1.58 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2017 | -0.06x | CA$-98.95K | CA$1.52 Million | ▼ -65.2% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | CA$-59.88K | CA$1.52 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | CA$-62.95K | CA$1.53 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | CA$-74.34K | CA$1.52 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | CA$-70.92K | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | CA$-93.78K | CA$1.39 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2011 | -0.14x | CA$-198.73K | CA$1.45 Million | ▼ -288.8% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | CA$-41.52K | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | CA$-63.30K | CA$1.12 Million | ▼ -204.1% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | CA$-24.18K | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | CA$-92.04K | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2006 | -0.09x | CA$-121.18K | CA$1.38 Million | ▼ -682.7% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | CA$16.26K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2004 | -3.60x | CA$-276.87K | CA$76.89K | ▼ -866.7% |
| 2003 | 0.47x | CA$84.36K | CA$179.60K | ▲ +120.1% |
| 2002 | -2.33x | CA$-70.33K | CA$30.17K | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2001 | -3.11x | CA$-35.29K | CA$11.34K | — |