Finlay Minerals Ltd (FYL) — Net Asset Quality Index
Finlay Minerals Ltd (FYL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 74.7% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$15.65 Million minus total liabilities of CA$3.96 Million yields net assets of CA$11.69 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See operational self-sufficiency of Finlay Minerals Ltd to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Finlay Minerals Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Finlay Minerals Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 74.7%, representing net assets of CA$11.69 Million against total assets of CA$15.65 Million CAD. Explore FYL operating cash flow to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Finlay Minerals Ltd (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Finlay Minerals Ltd from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see how much is Finlay Minerals Ltd worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 86.2% | CA$10.11 Million | CA$11.73 Million | CA$1.62 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2023 | 85.5% | CA$10.18 Million | CA$11.91 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2022 | 84.8% | CA$9.86 Million | CA$11.63 Million | CA$1.77 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2021 | 84.0% | CA$10.10 Million | CA$12.02 Million | CA$1.92 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2020 | 82.1% | CA$7.58 Million | CA$9.24 Million | CA$1.66 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2019 | 81.4% | CA$7.59 Million | CA$9.33 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 81.4% | CA$6.89 Million | CA$8.47 Million | CA$1.58 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2017 | 81.9% | CA$6.90 Million | CA$8.42 Million | CA$1.52 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2016 | 81.2% | CA$6.59 Million | CA$8.11 Million | CA$1.52 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 80.7% | CA$6.44 Million | CA$7.97 Million | CA$1.53 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2014 | 81.1% | CA$6.52 Million | CA$8.04 Million | CA$1.52 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 81.4% | CA$6.33 Million | CA$7.77 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 81.8% | CA$6.26 Million | CA$7.65 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 81.1% | CA$6.19 Million | CA$7.64 Million | CA$1.45 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2010 | 84.5% | CA$6.41 Million | CA$7.59 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2009 | 81.6% | CA$4.96 Million | CA$6.07 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2008 | 78.5% | CA$4.73 Million | CA$6.03 Million | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2007 | 77.9% | CA$4.68 Million | CA$6.01 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +4.4 pp |
| 2006 | 73.5% | CA$3.84 Million | CA$5.22 Million | CA$1.38 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 76.5% | CA$3.53 Million | CA$4.61 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -21.6 pp |
| 2004 | 98.2% | CA$4.14 Million | CA$4.22 Million | CA$76.89K | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2003 | 94.9% | CA$3.31 Million | CA$3.49 Million | CA$179.60K | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2002 | 96.6% | CA$846.82K | CA$876.99K | CA$30.17K | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2001 | 97.8% | CA$511.71K | CA$523.05K | CA$11.34K | — |