Gabriel Resources Ltd (GBU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gabriel Resources Ltd (GBU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.74 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$23.73 Million) in one year. See Gabriel Resources Ltd free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gabriel Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gabriel Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore GBU net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gabriel Resources Ltd (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gabriel Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GBU market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.42x | CA$-10.24 Million | CA$24.34 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2023 | -0.51x | CA$-10.56 Million | CA$20.71 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2022 | -1.09x | CA$-8.30 Million | CA$7.65 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2021 | -1.70x | CA$-11.35 Million | CA$6.69 Million | ▼ -406.1% |
| 2020 | -0.34x | CA$-29.94 Million | CA$89.34 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2019 | -0.31x | CA$-28.07 Million | CA$91.42 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2018 | -0.49x | CA$-38.00 Million | CA$77.70 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2017 | -0.40x | CA$-27.44 Million | CA$68.80 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2016 | -0.30x | CA$-18.70 Million | CA$61.48 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | CA$-11.79 Million | CA$35.69 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2014 | -0.20x | CA$-7.66 Million | CA$39.05 Million | ▼ -461.3% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | CA$-587.00K | CA$16.80 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2012 | -0.36x | CA$-6.68 Million | CA$18.33 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2011 | -0.27x | CA$-7.09 Million | CA$25.83 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2010 | -0.56x | CA$-10.11 Million | CA$18.05 Million | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2009 | -1.07x | CA$-21.15 Million | CA$19.75 Million | ▼ -1021.7% |
| 2008 | -0.10x | CA$-4.98 Million | CA$52.12 Million | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2007 | -0.47x | CA$-16.03 Million | CA$33.86 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2006 | -0.51x | CA$-7.55 Million | CA$14.71 Million | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2005 | -1.71x | CA$-5.22 Million | CA$3.05 Million | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2004 | -2.50x | CA$-7.04 Million | CA$2.82 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2003 | -2.60x | CA$-14.64 Million | CA$5.64 Million | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2002 | -1.33x | CA$-6.00 Million | CA$4.52 Million | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2001 | -3.53x | CA$-5.84 Million | CA$1.65 Million | ▼ -151.8% |
| 2000 | -1.40x | CA$-3.67 Million | CA$2.61 Million | ▼ -138.6% |
| 1999 | -0.59x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$5.10 Million | ▼ -275.6% |
| 1998 | -0.16x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$8.30 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 1997 | -2.60x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$500.00K | — |