Granada Gold Mine Inc (GGM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Granada Gold Mine Inc (GGM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-30.64K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.20 Million) in one year. See Granada Gold Mine Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Granada Gold Mine Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Granada Gold Mine Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore GGM net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Granada Gold Mine Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Granada Gold Mine Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GGM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | CA$-264.62K | CA$14.15 Million | ▼ -3802.0% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$-6.26K | CA$13.07 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-122.75K | CA$11.34 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2022 | -0.19x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$9.81 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2021 | -0.56x | CA$-5.30 Million | CA$9.40 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2020 | -0.25x | CA$-2.10 Million | CA$8.26 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2019 | -0.21x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$6.91 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | CA$-2.84 Million | CA$5.68 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2017 | -0.70x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$5.16 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$4.91 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2015 | -0.72x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$3.75 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 2014 | -0.45x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$3.37 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2013 | -1.00x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2012 | -2.25x | CA$-11.50 Million | CA$5.12 Million | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2011 | -4.35x | CA$-14.44 Million | CA$3.32 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2010 | -2.46x | CA$-1.97 Million | CA$799.91K | ▼ -137.9% |
| 2009 | -1.03x | CA$-573.34K | CA$554.51K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2008 | -0.72x | CA$-456.25K | CA$633.20K | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2007 | -1.96x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$572.88K | ▼ -901.6% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | CA$-128.91K | CA$657.52K | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2005 | -0.78x | CA$-162.29K | CA$209.33K | ▼ -922.4% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | CA$-27.81K | CA$366.70K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | CA$-145.14K | CA$328.12K | ▼ -778.7% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | CA$-43.36K | CA$861.37K | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | CA$-42.01K | CA$986.15K | ▲ +83.5% |
| 2000 | -0.26x | CA$-231.39K | CA$893.69K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 1999 | -0.76x | CA$-611.93K | CA$808.08K | — |