Granada Gold Mine Inc (GGM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Granada Gold Mine Inc (GGM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-30.64K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.20 Million) in one year. Check Granada Gold Mine Inc (GGM) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Granada Gold Mine Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Granada Gold Mine Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore GGM total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Granada Gold Mine Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Granada Gold Mine Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GGM market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | CA$-264.62K | CA$14.15 Million | ▼ -3802.0% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$-6.26K | CA$13.07 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-122.75K | CA$11.34 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2022 | -0.19x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$9.81 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2021 | -0.56x | CA$-5.30 Million | CA$9.40 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2020 | -0.25x | CA$-2.10 Million | CA$8.26 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2019 | -0.21x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$6.91 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | CA$-2.84 Million | CA$5.68 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2017 | -0.70x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$5.16 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$4.91 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2015 | -0.72x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$3.75 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 2014 | -0.45x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$3.37 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2013 | -1.00x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2012 | -2.25x | CA$-11.50 Million | CA$5.12 Million | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2011 | -4.35x | CA$-14.44 Million | CA$3.32 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2010 | -2.46x | CA$-1.97 Million | CA$799.91K | ▼ -137.9% |
| 2009 | -1.03x | CA$-573.34K | CA$554.51K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2008 | -0.72x | CA$-456.25K | CA$633.20K | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2007 | -1.96x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$572.88K | ▼ -901.6% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | CA$-128.91K | CA$657.52K | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2005 | -0.78x | CA$-162.29K | CA$209.33K | ▼ -922.4% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | CA$-27.81K | CA$366.70K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | CA$-145.14K | CA$328.12K | ▼ -778.7% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | CA$-43.36K | CA$861.37K | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | CA$-42.01K | CA$986.15K | ▲ +83.5% |
| 2000 | -0.26x | CA$-231.39K | CA$893.69K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 1999 | -0.76x | CA$-611.93K | CA$808.08K | — |