Granada Gold Mine Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Granada Gold Mine Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Granada Gold Mine Inc (GGM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-30.64K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.20 Million) in one year. Check GGM operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Granada Gold Mine Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Granada Gold Mine Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Granada Gold Mine Inc across 27 annual periods. Check Granada Gold Mine Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Granada Gold Mine Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Granada Gold Mine Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Granada Gold Mine Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Granada Gold Mine Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | CA$-264.62K | CA$14.15 Million | ▼ -3802.0% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$-6.26K | CA$13.07 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-122.75K | CA$11.34 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2022 | -0.19x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$9.81 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2021 | -0.56x | CA$-5.30 Million | CA$9.40 Million | ▼ -121.6% |
| 2020 | -0.25x | CA$-2.10 Million | CA$8.26 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2019 | -0.21x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$6.91 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | CA$-2.84 Million | CA$5.68 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2017 | -0.70x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$5.16 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2016 | -0.51x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$4.91 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2015 | -0.72x | CA$-2.71 Million | CA$3.75 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 2014 | -0.45x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$3.37 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2013 | -1.00x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2012 | -2.25x | CA$-11.50 Million | CA$5.12 Million | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2011 | -4.35x | CA$-14.44 Million | CA$3.32 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2010 | -2.46x | CA$-1.97 Million | CA$799.91K | ▼ -137.9% |
| 2009 | -1.03x | CA$-573.34K | CA$554.51K | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2008 | -0.72x | CA$-456.25K | CA$633.20K | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2007 | -1.96x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$572.88K | ▼ -901.6% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | CA$-128.91K | CA$657.52K | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2005 | -0.78x | CA$-162.29K | CA$209.33K | ▼ -922.4% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | CA$-27.81K | CA$366.70K | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | CA$-145.14K | CA$328.12K | ▼ -778.7% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | CA$-43.36K | CA$861.37K | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | CA$-42.01K | CA$986.15K | ▲ +83.5% |
| 2000 | -0.26x | CA$-231.39K | CA$893.69K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 1999 | -0.76x | CA$-611.93K | CA$808.08K | — |