Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-461.61K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$36.83 Million) in one year. See GGO cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Galleon Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Galleon Gold Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Galleon Gold Corp to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Galleon Gold Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Galleon Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GGO market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.08x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$21.77 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2024 | -0.28x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$8.75 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$5.61 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$3.51 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2021 | -0.49x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$3.70 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | -0.46x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$5.59 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | -0.36x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$3.27 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2018 | -0.43x | CA$-297.77K | CA$687.32K | ▼ -257.3% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | CA$237.91K | CA$863.63K | ▲ +106.0% |
| 2016 | -4.58x | CA$-770.66K | CA$168.38K | ▼ -577.7% |
| 2015 | 0.96x | CA$206.22K | CA$215.24K | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2014 | -13.01x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$107.95K | ▼ -521.6% |
| 2013 | 3.09x | CA$457.87K | CA$148.36K | ▲ +535.8% |
| 2012 | -0.71x | CA$-310.06K | CA$437.82K | ▲ +97.2% |
| 2011 | -25.40x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$152.67K | ▼ -910.2% |
| 2010 | -2.51x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$438.46K | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2009 | -4.65x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$325.02K | ▼ -338.1% |
| 2008 | -1.06x | CA$-484.25K | CA$455.83K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2007 | -5.84x | CA$-2.79 Million | CA$477.08K | ▼ -323.8% |
| 2006 | -1.38x | CA$-340.27K | CA$246.91K | ▲ +84.5% |
| 2005 | -8.92x | CA$-501.01K | CA$56.18K | ▼ -1444.0% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | CA$-521.28K | CA$902.50K | ▼ -513.4% |
| 2003 | -0.09x | CA$-101.39K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | CA$-169.09K | CA$1.21 Million | ▼ -878.7% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | CA$12.78K | CA$710.14K | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-28.69K | CA$627.38K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 1999 | -0.40x | CA$-220.24K | CA$554.77K | ▼ -167.5% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | CA$886.08K | CA$1.51 Million | — |