Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$39.56 Million) in one year. See GGO free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Galleon Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Galleon Gold Corp across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Galleon Gold Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Galleon Gold Corp. Check GGO cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.08x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$21.77 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2024 | -0.28x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$8.75 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$5.61 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$3.51 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2021 | -0.49x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$3.70 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | -0.46x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$5.59 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | -0.36x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$3.27 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2018 | -0.43x | CA$-297.77K | CA$687.32K | ▼ -257.3% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | CA$237.91K | CA$863.63K | ▲ +106.0% |
| 2016 | -4.58x | CA$-770.66K | CA$168.38K | ▼ -577.7% |
| 2015 | 0.96x | CA$206.22K | CA$215.24K | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2014 | -13.01x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$107.95K | ▼ -521.6% |
| 2013 | 3.09x | CA$457.87K | CA$148.36K | ▲ +535.8% |
| 2012 | -0.71x | CA$-310.06K | CA$437.82K | ▲ +97.2% |
| 2011 | -25.40x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$152.67K | ▼ -910.2% |
| 2010 | -2.51x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$438.46K | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2009 | -4.65x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$325.02K | ▼ -338.1% |
| 2008 | -1.06x | CA$-484.25K | CA$455.83K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2007 | -5.84x | CA$-2.79 Million | CA$477.08K | ▼ -323.8% |
| 2006 | -1.38x | CA$-340.27K | CA$246.91K | ▲ +84.5% |
| 2005 | -8.92x | CA$-501.01K | CA$56.18K | ▼ -1444.0% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | CA$-521.28K | CA$902.50K | ▼ -513.4% |
| 2003 | -0.09x | CA$-101.39K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | CA$-169.09K | CA$1.21 Million | ▼ -878.7% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | CA$12.78K | CA$710.14K | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-28.69K | CA$627.38K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 1999 | -0.40x | CA$-220.24K | CA$554.77K | ▼ -167.5% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | CA$886.08K | CA$1.51 Million | — |