Galleon Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Galleon Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.45 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$39.56 Million) in one year. Check Galleon Gold Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Galleon Gold Corp (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Galleon Gold Corp from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Galleon Gold Corp across 28 annual periods. Check Galleon Gold Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Galleon Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Galleon Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Galleon Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Galleon Gold Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.08x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$21.77 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2024 | -0.28x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$8.75 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$5.61 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$3.51 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2021 | -0.49x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$3.70 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | -0.46x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$5.59 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | -0.36x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$3.27 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2018 | -0.43x | CA$-297.77K | CA$687.32K | ▼ -257.3% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | CA$237.91K | CA$863.63K | ▲ +106.0% |
| 2016 | -4.58x | CA$-770.66K | CA$168.38K | ▼ -577.7% |
| 2015 | 0.96x | CA$206.22K | CA$215.24K | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2014 | -13.01x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$107.95K | ▼ -521.6% |
| 2013 | 3.09x | CA$457.87K | CA$148.36K | ▲ +535.8% |
| 2012 | -0.71x | CA$-310.06K | CA$437.82K | ▲ +97.2% |
| 2011 | -25.40x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$152.67K | ▼ -910.2% |
| 2010 | -2.51x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$438.46K | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2009 | -4.65x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$325.02K | ▼ -338.1% |
| 2008 | -1.06x | CA$-484.25K | CA$455.83K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2007 | -5.84x | CA$-2.79 Million | CA$477.08K | ▼ -323.8% |
| 2006 | -1.38x | CA$-340.27K | CA$246.91K | ▲ +84.5% |
| 2005 | -8.92x | CA$-501.01K | CA$56.18K | ▼ -1444.0% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | CA$-521.28K | CA$902.50K | ▼ -513.4% |
| 2003 | -0.09x | CA$-101.39K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | CA$-169.09K | CA$1.21 Million | ▼ -878.7% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | CA$12.78K | CA$710.14K | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-28.69K | CA$627.38K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 1999 | -0.40x | CA$-220.24K | CA$554.77K | ▼ -167.5% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | CA$886.08K | CA$1.51 Million | — |