Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-461.61K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$36.83 Million) in one year. Check Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Galleon Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Galleon Gold Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore GGO asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Galleon Gold Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Galleon Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Galleon Gold Corp (GGO) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.08x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$21.77 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2024 | -0.28x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$8.75 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$5.61 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | CA$-2.73 Million | CA$3.51 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2021 | -0.49x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$3.70 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | -0.46x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$5.59 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | -0.36x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$3.27 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2018 | -0.43x | CA$-297.77K | CA$687.32K | ▼ -257.3% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | CA$237.91K | CA$863.63K | ▲ +106.0% |
| 2016 | -4.58x | CA$-770.66K | CA$168.38K | ▼ -577.7% |
| 2015 | 0.96x | CA$206.22K | CA$215.24K | ▲ +107.4% |
| 2014 | -13.01x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$107.95K | ▼ -521.6% |
| 2013 | 3.09x | CA$457.87K | CA$148.36K | ▲ +535.8% |
| 2012 | -0.71x | CA$-310.06K | CA$437.82K | ▲ +97.2% |
| 2011 | -25.40x | CA$-3.88 Million | CA$152.67K | ▼ -910.2% |
| 2010 | -2.51x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$438.46K | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2009 | -4.65x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$325.02K | ▼ -338.1% |
| 2008 | -1.06x | CA$-484.25K | CA$455.83K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2007 | -5.84x | CA$-2.79 Million | CA$477.08K | ▼ -323.8% |
| 2006 | -1.38x | CA$-340.27K | CA$246.91K | ▲ +84.5% |
| 2005 | -8.92x | CA$-501.01K | CA$56.18K | ▼ -1444.0% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | CA$-521.28K | CA$902.50K | ▼ -513.4% |
| 2003 | -0.09x | CA$-101.39K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | CA$-169.09K | CA$1.21 Million | ▼ -878.7% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | CA$12.78K | CA$710.14K | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-28.69K | CA$627.38K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 1999 | -0.40x | CA$-220.24K | CA$554.77K | ▼ -167.5% |
| 1998 | 0.59x | CA$886.08K | CA$1.51 Million | — |