GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -4.49x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-92.96K could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities (CA$20.70K) in one year. See GoldOn Resources Ltd free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
GoldOn Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for GoldOn Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for GoldOn Resources Ltd (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GoldOn Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GLD market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.83x | CA$-206.89K | CA$35.50K | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2023 | -3.09x | CA$-289.17K | CA$93.70K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2022 | -4.96x | CA$-155.45K | CA$31.34K | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2021 | -10.67x | CA$-846.93K | CA$79.34K | ▼ -606.6% |
| 2020 | -1.51x | CA$-456.88K | CA$302.43K | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2019 | -2.08x | CA$-233.34K | CA$112.23K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2018 | -3.34x | CA$-170.22K | CA$50.96K | ▲ +73.2% |
| 2017 | -12.48x | CA$-242.24K | CA$19.40K | ▼ -628.1% |
| 2016 | -1.71x | CA$-263.54K | CA$153.70K | ▼ -214.9% |
| 2015 | -0.54x | CA$-186.92K | CA$343.27K | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2014 | -1.04x | CA$-210.59K | CA$201.82K | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2013 | -8.40x | CA$-475.51K | CA$56.58K | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2012 | -17.01x | CA$-426.10K | CA$25.06K | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2011 | -13.91x | CA$-507.22K | CA$36.47K | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2010 | -12.75x | CA$-630.71K | CA$49.48K | ▼ -194.1% |
| 2009 | -4.33x | CA$-224.21K | CA$51.73K | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2008 | -11.34x | CA$-269.62K | CA$23.78K | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2007 | -8.99x | CA$-306.86K | CA$34.13K | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2006 | -7.92x | CA$-191.65K | CA$24.20K | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2005 | -7.47x | CA$-177.14K | CA$23.71K | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2004 | -7.60x | CA$-190.74K | CA$25.11K | ▼ -181.5% |
| 2003 | -2.70x | CA$-114.58K | CA$42.46K | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2002 | -3.09x | CA$-125.99K | CA$40.75K | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2001 | -2.76x | CA$-100.47K | CA$36.41K | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2000 | -5.55x | CA$-149.67K | CA$26.95K | ▼ -326.9% |
| 1999 | -1.30x | CA$-138.96K | CA$106.83K | ▼ -15.3% |
| 1998 | -1.13x | CA$-135.29K | CA$119.97K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 1997 | -3.13x | CA$-132.75K | CA$42.46K | — |