GoldOn Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GoldOn Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -4.49x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-92.96K could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities (CA$20.70K) in one year. Check GoldOn Resources Ltd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of GoldOn Resources Ltd (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of GoldOn Resources Ltd from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for GoldOn Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Check GoldOn Resources Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
GoldOn Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
GoldOn Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GoldOn Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GLD cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.83x | CA$-206.89K | CA$35.50K | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2023 | -3.09x | CA$-289.17K | CA$93.70K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2022 | -4.96x | CA$-155.45K | CA$31.34K | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2021 | -10.67x | CA$-846.93K | CA$79.34K | ▼ -606.6% |
| 2020 | -1.51x | CA$-456.88K | CA$302.43K | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2019 | -2.08x | CA$-233.34K | CA$112.23K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2018 | -3.34x | CA$-170.22K | CA$50.96K | ▲ +73.2% |
| 2017 | -12.48x | CA$-242.24K | CA$19.40K | ▼ -628.1% |
| 2016 | -1.71x | CA$-263.54K | CA$153.70K | ▼ -214.9% |
| 2015 | -0.54x | CA$-186.92K | CA$343.27K | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2014 | -1.04x | CA$-210.59K | CA$201.82K | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2013 | -8.40x | CA$-475.51K | CA$56.58K | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2012 | -17.01x | CA$-426.10K | CA$25.06K | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2011 | -13.91x | CA$-507.22K | CA$36.47K | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2010 | -12.75x | CA$-630.71K | CA$49.48K | ▼ -194.1% |
| 2009 | -4.33x | CA$-224.21K | CA$51.73K | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2008 | -11.34x | CA$-269.62K | CA$23.78K | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2007 | -8.99x | CA$-306.86K | CA$34.13K | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2006 | -7.92x | CA$-191.65K | CA$24.20K | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2005 | -7.47x | CA$-177.14K | CA$23.71K | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2004 | -7.60x | CA$-190.74K | CA$25.11K | ▼ -181.5% |
| 2003 | -2.70x | CA$-114.58K | CA$42.46K | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2002 | -3.09x | CA$-125.99K | CA$40.75K | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2001 | -2.76x | CA$-100.47K | CA$36.41K | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2000 | -5.55x | CA$-149.67K | CA$26.95K | ▼ -326.9% |
| 1999 | -1.30x | CA$-138.96K | CA$106.83K | ▼ -15.3% |
| 1998 | -1.13x | CA$-135.29K | CA$119.97K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 1997 | -3.13x | CA$-132.75K | CA$42.46K | — |