GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) — Net Asset Quality Index
GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 97.9% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$965.60K minus total liabilities of CA$20.70K yields net assets of CA$944.90K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read GoldOn Resources Ltd debt and liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
GoldOn Resources Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2024)
This chart shows how GoldOn Resources Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1997 to 2024. As of December 2025, the index stands at 97.9%, representing net assets of CA$944.90K against total assets of CA$965.60K CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see GoldOn Resources Ltd market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for GoldOn Resources Ltd (1997–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for GoldOn Resources Ltd from 1997 to 2024, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check GoldOn Resources Ltd strategic capital allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 89.0% | CA$287.63K | CA$323.13K | CA$35.50K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2023 | 88.2% | CA$703.31K | CA$797.01K | CA$93.70K | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 2022 | 99.4% | CA$4.82 Million | CA$4.85 Million | CA$31.34K | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2021 | 98.7% | CA$5.83 Million | CA$5.91 Million | CA$79.34K | ▲ +8.5 pp |
| 2020 | 90.2% | CA$2.77 Million | CA$3.07 Million | CA$302.43K | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2019 | 90.9% | CA$1.12 Million | CA$1.24 Million | CA$112.23K | ▲ +12.3 pp |
| 2018 | 78.6% | CA$187.24K | CA$238.20K | CA$50.96K | ▼ -16.8 pp |
| 2017 | 95.4% | CA$406.11K | CA$425.51K | CA$19.40K | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 2016 | 82.2% | CA$709.65K | CA$863.35K | CA$153.70K | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2015 | 77.6% | CA$1.19 Million | CA$1.53 Million | CA$343.27K | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2014 | 87.9% | CA$1.46 Million | CA$1.67 Million | CA$201.82K | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2013 | 98.2% | CA$3.06 Million | CA$3.12 Million | CA$56.58K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2012 | 99.3% | CA$3.74 Million | CA$3.76 Million | CA$25.06K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2011 | 98.8% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$3.11 Million | CA$36.47K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2010 | 97.9% | CA$2.32 Million | CA$2.37 Million | CA$49.48K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2009 | 96.5% | CA$1.44 Million | CA$1.49 Million | CA$51.73K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2008 | 98.5% | CA$1.54 Million | CA$1.56 Million | CA$23.78K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 96.6% | CA$970.53K | CA$1.00 Million | CA$34.13K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2006 | 97.3% | CA$869.42K | CA$893.62K | CA$24.20K | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2005 | 91.7% | CA$263.04K | CA$286.74K | CA$23.71K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2004 | 93.1% | CA$338.06K | CA$363.17K | CA$25.11K | ▲ +15.3 pp |
| 2003 | 77.8% | CA$149.10K | CA$191.56K | CA$42.46K | ▲ +12.2 pp |
| 2002 | 65.6% | CA$77.86K | CA$118.61K | CA$40.75K | ▲ +46.4 pp |
| 2001 | 19.3% | CA$8.70K | CA$45.10K | CA$36.41K | ▼ -79.1 pp |
| 2000 | 98.3% | CA$1.60 Million | CA$1.63 Million | CA$26.95K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 1999 | 93.4% | CA$1.51 Million | CA$1.62 Million | CA$106.83K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 1998 | 92.8% | CA$1.55 Million | CA$1.67 Million | CA$119.97K | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 1997 | 97.5% | CA$1.69 Million | CA$1.73 Million | CA$42.46K | — |