GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) — Net Asset Quality Index
GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 97.9% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$965.60K minus total liabilities of CA$20.70K yields net assets of CA$944.90K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check GLD asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
GoldOn Resources Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2024)
This chart shows how GoldOn Resources Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1997 to 2024. As of December 2025, the index stands at 97.9%, representing net assets of CA$944.90K against total assets of CA$965.60K CAD. See working capital to net assets of GoldOn Resources Ltd to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for GoldOn Resources Ltd (1997–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for GoldOn Resources Ltd from 1997 to 2024, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see GoldOn Resources Ltd (GLD) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 89.0% | CA$287.63K | CA$323.13K | CA$35.50K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2023 | 88.2% | CA$703.31K | CA$797.01K | CA$93.70K | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 2022 | 99.4% | CA$4.82 Million | CA$4.85 Million | CA$31.34K | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2021 | 98.7% | CA$5.83 Million | CA$5.91 Million | CA$79.34K | ▲ +8.5 pp |
| 2020 | 90.2% | CA$2.77 Million | CA$3.07 Million | CA$302.43K | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2019 | 90.9% | CA$1.12 Million | CA$1.24 Million | CA$112.23K | ▲ +12.3 pp |
| 2018 | 78.6% | CA$187.24K | CA$238.20K | CA$50.96K | ▼ -16.8 pp |
| 2017 | 95.4% | CA$406.11K | CA$425.51K | CA$19.40K | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 2016 | 82.2% | CA$709.65K | CA$863.35K | CA$153.70K | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2015 | 77.6% | CA$1.19 Million | CA$1.53 Million | CA$343.27K | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2014 | 87.9% | CA$1.46 Million | CA$1.67 Million | CA$201.82K | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2013 | 98.2% | CA$3.06 Million | CA$3.12 Million | CA$56.58K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2012 | 99.3% | CA$3.74 Million | CA$3.76 Million | CA$25.06K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2011 | 98.8% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$3.11 Million | CA$36.47K | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2010 | 97.9% | CA$2.32 Million | CA$2.37 Million | CA$49.48K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2009 | 96.5% | CA$1.44 Million | CA$1.49 Million | CA$51.73K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2008 | 98.5% | CA$1.54 Million | CA$1.56 Million | CA$23.78K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 96.6% | CA$970.53K | CA$1.00 Million | CA$34.13K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2006 | 97.3% | CA$869.42K | CA$893.62K | CA$24.20K | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2005 | 91.7% | CA$263.04K | CA$286.74K | CA$23.71K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2004 | 93.1% | CA$338.06K | CA$363.17K | CA$25.11K | ▲ +15.3 pp |
| 2003 | 77.8% | CA$149.10K | CA$191.56K | CA$42.46K | ▲ +12.2 pp |
| 2002 | 65.6% | CA$77.86K | CA$118.61K | CA$40.75K | ▲ +46.4 pp |
| 2001 | 19.3% | CA$8.70K | CA$45.10K | CA$36.41K | ▼ -79.1 pp |
| 2000 | 98.3% | CA$1.60 Million | CA$1.63 Million | CA$26.95K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 1999 | 93.4% | CA$1.51 Million | CA$1.62 Million | CA$106.83K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 1998 | 92.8% | CA$1.55 Million | CA$1.67 Million | CA$119.97K | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 1997 | 97.5% | CA$1.69 Million | CA$1.73 Million | CA$42.46K | — |