Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.44x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-288.75K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$650.60K) in one year. See Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. across 25 annual periods. Also explore GNG net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.24x | CA$-117.83K | CA$483.44K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2024 | -1.61x | CA$-535.27K | CA$332.31K | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2023 | -0.79x | CA$-281.92K | CA$355.87K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2022 | -1.18x | CA$-268.95K | CA$228.00K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2021 | -0.91x | CA$-330.28K | CA$362.49K | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2020 | -3.19x | CA$-627.98K | CA$197.14K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2019 | -6.14x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$176.61K | ▼ -2621.5% |
| 2018 | -0.23x | CA$-176.62K | CA$783.42K | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-174.76K | CA$631.40K | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2016 | -0.25x | CA$-119.41K | CA$479.75K | ▼ -260.3% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$101.38K | CA$653.01K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2014 | -5.80x | CA$-664.93K | CA$114.62K | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2013 | -7.88x | CA$-847.79K | CA$107.60K | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2012 | -5.76x | CA$-941.41K | CA$163.46K | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2011 | -5.09x | CA$-886.05K | CA$173.93K | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2010 | -3.51x | CA$-710.08K | CA$202.37K | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2009 | -10.95x | CA$-721.12K | CA$65.88K | ▼ -501.9% |
| 2008 | -1.82x | CA$-910.58K | CA$500.70K | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2007 | -2.54x | CA$-766.89K | CA$301.40K | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2006 | -15.30x | CA$-533.05K | CA$34.85K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2005 | -11.81x | CA$-489.87K | CA$41.48K | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2004 | -9.93x | CA$-445.71K | CA$44.87K | ▲ +36.5% |
| 2003 | -15.63x | CA$-664.30K | CA$42.49K | ▼ -1291.8% |
| 2002 | -1.12x | CA$-288.82K | CA$257.15K | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2001 | -21.21x | CA$-956.87K | CA$45.12K | — |