Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.29x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-504.45K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$389.98K) in one year. Check Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. across 25 annual periods. Check Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.24x | CA$-117.83K | CA$483.44K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2024 | -1.61x | CA$-535.27K | CA$332.31K | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2023 | -0.79x | CA$-281.92K | CA$355.87K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2022 | -1.18x | CA$-268.95K | CA$228.00K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2021 | -0.91x | CA$-330.28K | CA$362.49K | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2020 | -3.19x | CA$-627.98K | CA$197.14K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2019 | -6.14x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$176.61K | ▼ -2621.5% |
| 2018 | -0.23x | CA$-176.62K | CA$783.42K | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-174.76K | CA$631.40K | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2016 | -0.25x | CA$-119.41K | CA$479.75K | ▼ -260.3% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$101.38K | CA$653.01K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2014 | -5.80x | CA$-664.93K | CA$114.62K | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2013 | -7.88x | CA$-847.79K | CA$107.60K | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2012 | -5.76x | CA$-941.41K | CA$163.46K | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2011 | -5.09x | CA$-886.05K | CA$173.93K | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2010 | -3.51x | CA$-710.08K | CA$202.37K | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2009 | -10.95x | CA$-721.12K | CA$65.88K | ▼ -501.9% |
| 2008 | -1.82x | CA$-910.58K | CA$500.70K | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2007 | -2.54x | CA$-766.89K | CA$301.40K | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2006 | -15.30x | CA$-533.05K | CA$34.85K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2005 | -11.81x | CA$-489.87K | CA$41.48K | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2004 | -9.93x | CA$-445.71K | CA$44.87K | ▲ +36.5% |
| 2003 | -15.63x | CA$-664.30K | CA$42.49K | ▼ -1291.8% |
| 2002 | -1.12x | CA$-288.82K | CA$257.15K | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2001 | -21.21x | CA$-956.87K | CA$45.12K | — |