Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.44x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-288.75K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$650.60K) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. across 25 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.24x | CA$-117.83K | CA$483.44K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2024 | -1.61x | CA$-535.27K | CA$332.31K | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2023 | -0.79x | CA$-281.92K | CA$355.87K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2022 | -1.18x | CA$-268.95K | CA$228.00K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2021 | -0.91x | CA$-330.28K | CA$362.49K | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2020 | -3.19x | CA$-627.98K | CA$197.14K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2019 | -6.14x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$176.61K | ▼ -2621.5% |
| 2018 | -0.23x | CA$-176.62K | CA$783.42K | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-174.76K | CA$631.40K | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2016 | -0.25x | CA$-119.41K | CA$479.75K | ▼ -260.3% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$101.38K | CA$653.01K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2014 | -5.80x | CA$-664.93K | CA$114.62K | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2013 | -7.88x | CA$-847.79K | CA$107.60K | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2012 | -5.76x | CA$-941.41K | CA$163.46K | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2011 | -5.09x | CA$-886.05K | CA$173.93K | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2010 | -3.51x | CA$-710.08K | CA$202.37K | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2009 | -10.95x | CA$-721.12K | CA$65.88K | ▼ -501.9% |
| 2008 | -1.82x | CA$-910.58K | CA$500.70K | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2007 | -2.54x | CA$-766.89K | CA$301.40K | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2006 | -15.30x | CA$-533.05K | CA$34.85K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2005 | -11.81x | CA$-489.87K | CA$41.48K | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2004 | -9.93x | CA$-445.71K | CA$44.87K | ▲ +36.5% |
| 2003 | -15.63x | CA$-664.30K | CA$42.49K | ▼ -1291.8% |
| 2002 | -1.12x | CA$-288.82K | CA$257.15K | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2001 | -21.21x | CA$-956.87K | CA$45.12K | — |