Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (GNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.29x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-504.45K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$389.98K) in one year. See Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GNG operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.. Check how high is Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.24x | CA$-117.83K | CA$483.44K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2024 | -1.61x | CA$-535.27K | CA$332.31K | ▼ -103.3% |
| 2023 | -0.79x | CA$-281.92K | CA$355.87K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2022 | -1.18x | CA$-268.95K | CA$228.00K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2021 | -0.91x | CA$-330.28K | CA$362.49K | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2020 | -3.19x | CA$-627.98K | CA$197.14K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2019 | -6.14x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$176.61K | ▼ -2621.5% |
| 2018 | -0.23x | CA$-176.62K | CA$783.42K | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-174.76K | CA$631.40K | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2016 | -0.25x | CA$-119.41K | CA$479.75K | ▼ -260.3% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$101.38K | CA$653.01K | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2014 | -5.80x | CA$-664.93K | CA$114.62K | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2013 | -7.88x | CA$-847.79K | CA$107.60K | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2012 | -5.76x | CA$-941.41K | CA$163.46K | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2011 | -5.09x | CA$-886.05K | CA$173.93K | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2010 | -3.51x | CA$-710.08K | CA$202.37K | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2009 | -10.95x | CA$-721.12K | CA$65.88K | ▼ -501.9% |
| 2008 | -1.82x | CA$-910.58K | CA$500.70K | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2007 | -2.54x | CA$-766.89K | CA$301.40K | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2006 | -15.30x | CA$-533.05K | CA$34.85K | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2005 | -11.81x | CA$-489.87K | CA$41.48K | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2004 | -9.93x | CA$-445.71K | CA$44.87K | ▲ +36.5% |
| 2003 | -15.63x | CA$-664.30K | CA$42.49K | ▼ -1291.8% |
| 2002 | -1.12x | CA$-288.82K | CA$257.15K | ▲ +94.7% |
| 2001 | -21.21x | CA$-956.87K | CA$45.12K | — |