Gensource Potash Corporation (GSP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gensource Potash Corporation (GSP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-48.93K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$14.73 Million) in one year. Explore GSP long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gensource Potash Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gensource Potash Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore Gensource Potash Corporation total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gensource Potash Corporation (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gensource Potash Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GSP market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.04x | CA$-530.82K | CA$12.79 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$10.48 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$9.50 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2021 | -1.13x | CA$-3.78 Million | CA$3.36 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2020 | -4.05x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$537.48K | ▼ -5232.5% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-157.43K | CA$2.07 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2018 | -3.12x | CA$-2.01 Million | CA$645.44K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2017 | -20.68x | CA$-4.31 Million | CA$208.55K | ▼ -11462.8% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$468.75K | CA$2.58 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2015 | -4.57x | CA$-872.75K | CA$191.11K | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2014 | -20.79x | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$56.82K | ▼ -249.7% |
| 2013 | -5.94x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$307.96K | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2012 | -5.18x | CA$-2.27 Million | CA$438.73K | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2011 | -4.81x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$299.69K | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2010 | -5.19x | CA$-2.76 Million | CA$531.77K | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2009 | -4.05x | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$278.21K | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2008 | -5.03x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$296.36K | ▼ -1182.0% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | CA$297.23K | CA$639.98K | ▲ +2252.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$32.18K | CA$1.63 Million | ▲ +103.1% |
| 2005 | -0.65x | CA$-249.26K | CA$386.42K | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2004 | -1.26x | CA$-503.47K | CA$399.50K | ▼ -123.0% |
| 2003 | -0.57x | CA$-357.67K | CA$632.99K | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2001 | -0.44x | CA$-151.27K | CA$347.09K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2000 | -1.10x | CA$-336.28K | CA$305.55K | ▼ -132.6% |
| 1999 | -0.47x | CA$-163.34K | CA$345.23K | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1998 | -2.06x | CA$-700.25K | CA$340.06K | ▼ -349.7% |
| 1997 | 0.82x | CA$555.83K | CA$674.02K | — |