Gensource Potash Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gensource Potash Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Gensource Potash Corporation (GSP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-48.93K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$14.73 Million) in one year. Check Gensource Potash Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Gensource Potash Corporation (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Gensource Potash Corporation from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Gensource Potash Corporation across 27 annual periods. Check Gensource Potash Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Gensource Potash Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Gensource Potash Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gensource Potash Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GSP cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.04x | CA$-530.82K | CA$12.79 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$10.48 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$9.50 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2021 | -1.13x | CA$-3.78 Million | CA$3.36 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2020 | -4.05x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$537.48K | ▼ -5232.5% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-157.43K | CA$2.07 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2018 | -3.12x | CA$-2.01 Million | CA$645.44K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2017 | -20.68x | CA$-4.31 Million | CA$208.55K | ▼ -11462.8% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$468.75K | CA$2.58 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2015 | -4.57x | CA$-872.75K | CA$191.11K | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2014 | -20.79x | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$56.82K | ▼ -249.7% |
| 2013 | -5.94x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$307.96K | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2012 | -5.18x | CA$-2.27 Million | CA$438.73K | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2011 | -4.81x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$299.69K | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2010 | -5.19x | CA$-2.76 Million | CA$531.77K | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2009 | -4.05x | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$278.21K | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2008 | -5.03x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$296.36K | ▼ -1182.0% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | CA$297.23K | CA$639.98K | ▲ +2252.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$32.18K | CA$1.63 Million | ▲ +103.1% |
| 2005 | -0.65x | CA$-249.26K | CA$386.42K | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2004 | -1.26x | CA$-503.47K | CA$399.50K | ▼ -123.0% |
| 2003 | -0.57x | CA$-357.67K | CA$632.99K | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2001 | -0.44x | CA$-151.27K | CA$347.09K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2000 | -1.10x | CA$-336.28K | CA$305.55K | ▼ -132.6% |
| 1999 | -0.47x | CA$-163.34K | CA$345.23K | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1998 | -2.06x | CA$-700.25K | CA$340.06K | ▼ -349.7% |
| 1997 | 0.82x | CA$555.83K | CA$674.02K | — |