Gensource Potash Corporation (GSP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gensource Potash Corporation (GSP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-48.93K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$14.73 Million) in one year. See GSP free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gensource Potash Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gensource Potash Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Gensource Potash Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gensource Potash Corporation (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gensource Potash Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Gensource Potash Corporation (GSP) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.04x | CA$-530.82K | CA$12.79 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$10.48 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$9.50 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2021 | -1.13x | CA$-3.78 Million | CA$3.36 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2020 | -4.05x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$537.48K | ▼ -5232.5% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-157.43K | CA$2.07 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2018 | -3.12x | CA$-2.01 Million | CA$645.44K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2017 | -20.68x | CA$-4.31 Million | CA$208.55K | ▼ -11462.8% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$468.75K | CA$2.58 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2015 | -4.57x | CA$-872.75K | CA$191.11K | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2014 | -20.79x | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$56.82K | ▼ -249.7% |
| 2013 | -5.94x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$307.96K | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2012 | -5.18x | CA$-2.27 Million | CA$438.73K | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2011 | -4.81x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$299.69K | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2010 | -5.19x | CA$-2.76 Million | CA$531.77K | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2009 | -4.05x | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$278.21K | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2008 | -5.03x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$296.36K | ▼ -1182.0% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | CA$297.23K | CA$639.98K | ▲ +2252.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$32.18K | CA$1.63 Million | ▲ +103.1% |
| 2005 | -0.65x | CA$-249.26K | CA$386.42K | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2004 | -1.26x | CA$-503.47K | CA$399.50K | ▼ -123.0% |
| 2003 | -0.57x | CA$-357.67K | CA$632.99K | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2001 | -0.44x | CA$-151.27K | CA$347.09K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2000 | -1.10x | CA$-336.28K | CA$305.55K | ▼ -132.6% |
| 1999 | -0.47x | CA$-163.34K | CA$345.23K | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1998 | -2.06x | CA$-700.25K | CA$340.06K | ▼ -349.7% |
| 1997 | 0.82x | CA$555.83K | CA$674.02K | — |