Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.35x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$15.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$43.80 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Hemisphere Energy Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hemisphere Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hemisphere Energy Corporation across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Hemisphere Energy Corporation generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hemisphere Energy Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hemisphere Energy Corporation. Check HME operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.26x | CA$46.55 Million | CA$36.95 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2023 | 1.50x | CA$44.24 Million | CA$29.51 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2022 | 1.80x | CA$45.09 Million | CA$25.02 Million | ▲ +305.2% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | CA$18.37 Million | CA$41.31 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | CA$9.39 Million | CA$36.17 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$10.50 Million | CA$43.46 Million | ▲ +369.3% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$43.33 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$1.92 Million | CA$28.71 Million | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | CA$432.60K | CA$17.80 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$18.10 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | CA$6.66 Million | CA$18.26 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | CA$3.67 Million | CA$9.17 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | CA$3.69 Million | CA$5.42 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | CA$863.25K | CA$1.46 Million | ▲ +134.8% |
| 2010 | -1.70x | CA$-501.67K | CA$294.47K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2009 | -0.82x | CA$-282.25K | CA$342.43K | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2008 | -0.64x | CA$-130.71K | CA$202.72K | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2007 | -2.49x | CA$-265.80K | CA$106.71K | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2006 | -3.18x | CA$-306.42K | CA$96.37K | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | -4.10x | CA$-542.73K | CA$132.27K | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2004 | -5.63x | CA$-638.24K | CA$113.41K | ▼ -152.1% |
| 2003 | -2.23x | CA$-416.18K | CA$186.44K | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2002 | -1.21x | CA$-170.89K | CA$141.55K | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2001 | -2.99x | CA$-178.56K | CA$59.66K | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2000 | -7.31x | CA$-355.47K | CA$48.65K | ▼ -819.3% |
| 1999 | -0.79x | CA$-91.32K | CA$114.89K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 1998 | -2.01x | CA$-171.84K | CA$85.60K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1997 | -3.82x | CA$-291.79K | CA$76.42K | ▼ -41.5% |
| 1996 | -2.70x | CA$-199.22K | CA$73.86K | — |