Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.35x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$15.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$43.80 Million) in one year. Explore Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hemisphere Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hemisphere Energy Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Hemisphere Energy Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hemisphere Energy Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hemisphere Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hemisphere Energy Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.26x | CA$46.55 Million | CA$36.95 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2023 | 1.50x | CA$44.24 Million | CA$29.51 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2022 | 1.80x | CA$45.09 Million | CA$25.02 Million | ▲ +305.2% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | CA$18.37 Million | CA$41.31 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | CA$9.39 Million | CA$36.17 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$10.50 Million | CA$43.46 Million | ▲ +369.3% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$43.33 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$1.92 Million | CA$28.71 Million | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | CA$432.60K | CA$17.80 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$18.10 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | CA$6.66 Million | CA$18.26 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | CA$3.67 Million | CA$9.17 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | CA$3.69 Million | CA$5.42 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | CA$863.25K | CA$1.46 Million | ▲ +134.8% |
| 2010 | -1.70x | CA$-501.67K | CA$294.47K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2009 | -0.82x | CA$-282.25K | CA$342.43K | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2008 | -0.64x | CA$-130.71K | CA$202.72K | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2007 | -2.49x | CA$-265.80K | CA$106.71K | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2006 | -3.18x | CA$-306.42K | CA$96.37K | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | -4.10x | CA$-542.73K | CA$132.27K | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2004 | -5.63x | CA$-638.24K | CA$113.41K | ▼ -152.1% |
| 2003 | -2.23x | CA$-416.18K | CA$186.44K | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2002 | -1.21x | CA$-170.89K | CA$141.55K | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2001 | -2.99x | CA$-178.56K | CA$59.66K | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2000 | -7.31x | CA$-355.47K | CA$48.65K | ▼ -819.3% |
| 1999 | -0.79x | CA$-91.32K | CA$114.89K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 1998 | -2.01x | CA$-171.84K | CA$85.60K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1997 | -3.82x | CA$-291.79K | CA$76.42K | ▼ -41.5% |
| 1996 | -2.70x | CA$-199.22K | CA$73.86K | — |