Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.35x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$15.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$43.80 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Hemisphere Energy Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hemisphere Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hemisphere Energy Corporation across 29 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Hemisphere Energy Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hemisphere Energy Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hemisphere Energy Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HME cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.26x | CA$46.55 Million | CA$36.95 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2023 | 1.50x | CA$44.24 Million | CA$29.51 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2022 | 1.80x | CA$45.09 Million | CA$25.02 Million | ▲ +305.2% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | CA$18.37 Million | CA$41.31 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | CA$9.39 Million | CA$36.17 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$10.50 Million | CA$43.46 Million | ▲ +369.3% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$43.33 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$1.92 Million | CA$28.71 Million | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | CA$432.60K | CA$17.80 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$18.10 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | CA$6.66 Million | CA$18.26 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | CA$3.67 Million | CA$9.17 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | CA$3.69 Million | CA$5.42 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | CA$863.25K | CA$1.46 Million | ▲ +134.8% |
| 2010 | -1.70x | CA$-501.67K | CA$294.47K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2009 | -0.82x | CA$-282.25K | CA$342.43K | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2008 | -0.64x | CA$-130.71K | CA$202.72K | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2007 | -2.49x | CA$-265.80K | CA$106.71K | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2006 | -3.18x | CA$-306.42K | CA$96.37K | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | -4.10x | CA$-542.73K | CA$132.27K | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2004 | -5.63x | CA$-638.24K | CA$113.41K | ▼ -152.1% |
| 2003 | -2.23x | CA$-416.18K | CA$186.44K | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2002 | -1.21x | CA$-170.89K | CA$141.55K | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2001 | -2.99x | CA$-178.56K | CA$59.66K | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2000 | -7.31x | CA$-355.47K | CA$48.65K | ▼ -819.3% |
| 1999 | -0.79x | CA$-91.32K | CA$114.89K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 1998 | -2.01x | CA$-171.84K | CA$85.60K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1997 | -3.82x | CA$-291.79K | CA$76.42K | ▼ -41.5% |
| 1996 | -2.70x | CA$-199.22K | CA$73.86K | — |