Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hemisphere Energy Corporation (HME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.35x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$15.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$43.80 Million) in one year. See HME FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hemisphere Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hemisphere Energy Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Hemisphere Energy Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hemisphere Energy Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hemisphere Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hemisphere Energy Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.26x | CA$46.55 Million | CA$36.95 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2023 | 1.50x | CA$44.24 Million | CA$29.51 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2022 | 1.80x | CA$45.09 Million | CA$25.02 Million | ▲ +305.2% |
| 2021 | 0.44x | CA$18.37 Million | CA$41.31 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | CA$9.39 Million | CA$36.17 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$10.50 Million | CA$43.46 Million | ▲ +369.3% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | CA$2.23 Million | CA$43.33 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$1.92 Million | CA$28.71 Million | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | CA$432.60K | CA$17.80 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$18.10 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | CA$6.66 Million | CA$18.26 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | CA$3.67 Million | CA$9.17 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2012 | 0.68x | CA$3.69 Million | CA$5.42 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | CA$863.25K | CA$1.46 Million | ▲ +134.8% |
| 2010 | -1.70x | CA$-501.67K | CA$294.47K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 2009 | -0.82x | CA$-282.25K | CA$342.43K | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2008 | -0.64x | CA$-130.71K | CA$202.72K | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2007 | -2.49x | CA$-265.80K | CA$106.71K | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2006 | -3.18x | CA$-306.42K | CA$96.37K | ▲ +22.5% |
| 2005 | -4.10x | CA$-542.73K | CA$132.27K | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2004 | -5.63x | CA$-638.24K | CA$113.41K | ▼ -152.1% |
| 2003 | -2.23x | CA$-416.18K | CA$186.44K | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2002 | -1.21x | CA$-170.89K | CA$141.55K | ▲ +59.7% |
| 2001 | -2.99x | CA$-178.56K | CA$59.66K | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2000 | -7.31x | CA$-355.47K | CA$48.65K | ▼ -819.3% |
| 1999 | -0.79x | CA$-91.32K | CA$114.89K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 1998 | -2.01x | CA$-171.84K | CA$85.60K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1997 | -3.82x | CA$-291.79K | CA$76.42K | ▼ -41.5% |
| 1996 | -2.70x | CA$-199.22K | CA$73.86K | — |