Iconic Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Iconic Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Iconic Minerals Ltd (ICM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.66x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.13 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$683.50K) in one year. Check ICM cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Iconic Minerals Ltd (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Iconic Minerals Ltd from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Iconic Minerals Ltd across 25 annual periods. Check ICM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Iconic Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Iconic Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Iconic Minerals Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ICM cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.40x | CA$-566.18K | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -171.9% |
| 2024 | -0.15x | CA$-222.80K | CA$1.52 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2023 | -2.39x | CA$-3.32 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▼ -1144.6% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | CA$1.70 Million | CA$7.45 Million | ▲ +3435.5% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | CA$29.60K | CA$4.58 Million | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2020 | -0.19x | CA$-768.59K | CA$4.14 Million | ▼ -19411.9% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | CA$-4.39K | CA$4.62 Million | ▲ +99.4% |
| 2018 | -0.17x | CA$-677.90K | CA$4.06 Million | ▼ -745.4% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | CA$-74.02K | CA$3.75 Million | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2016 | -0.73x | CA$-2.47 Million | CA$3.38 Million | ▼ -766.2% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | CA$-329.13K | CA$3.90 Million | ▼ -10595.2% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | CA$3.29K | CA$4.10 Million | ▲ +104.5% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | CA$-63.22K | CA$3.53 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 2012 | -0.24x | CA$-696.79K | CA$2.86 Million | ▼ -4371.9% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | CA$-20.08K | CA$3.69 Million | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | CA$-127.88K | CA$3.21 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2009 | -0.18x | CA$-681.32K | CA$3.89 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2008 | -0.46x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2007 | -0.64x | CA$-587.21K | CA$921.65K | ▲ +85.1% |
| 2006 | -4.27x | CA$-449.52K | CA$105.34K | ▼ -195.5% |
| 2005 | -1.44x | CA$-236.73K | CA$163.93K | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | -2.61x | CA$-299.45K | CA$114.69K | ▼ -1108.7% |
| 2003 | -0.22x | CA$-33.13K | CA$153.38K | ▲ +85.1% |
| 2002 | -1.45x | CA$-141.83K | CA$98.12K | ▼ -1533.7% |
| 2001 | -0.09x | CA$-68.29K | CA$771.78K | — |