Iconic Minerals Ltd (ICM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Iconic Minerals Ltd (ICM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of February 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$3.51 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See how liquid is Iconic Minerals Ltd's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Iconic Minerals Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2002–2025)
This chart shows how Iconic Minerals Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of February 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$3.51 Million with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See Iconic Minerals Ltd (ICM) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Iconic Minerals Ltd (2002–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Iconic Minerals Ltd from 2002 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Iconic Minerals Ltd market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | CA$362.23K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$277.07K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$2.87 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.26 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$1.57 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$9.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$2.47 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$7.04 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$437.98K | CA$0.00 | CA$4.58 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$152.03K | CA$0.00 | CA$4.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$665.71K | CA$0.00 | CA$4.57 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$126.71K | CA$0.00 | CA$4.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$532.22K | CA$0.00 | CA$4.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$746.94K | CA$0.00 | CA$3.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$1.50 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$6.28 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$3.95 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$7.83 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$15.54 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$17.88 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$13.39 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$14.31 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$1.62 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.72 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$1.09 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$252.81K | CA$0.00 | CA$367.50K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$75.19K | CA$0.00 | CA$228.57K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$465.81K | CA$0.00 | CA$563.93K | — |