Imaflex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imaflex Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Imaflex Inc (IFX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.55 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$25.95 Million) in one year. Check how high is Imaflex Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Imaflex Inc (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Imaflex Inc from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Imaflex Inc across 27 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Imaflex Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Imaflex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Imaflex Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imaflex Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see IFX cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.63x | CA$15.79 Million | CA$25.08 Million | ▲ +256.2% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | CA$4.88 Million | CA$27.62 Million | ▼ -82.8% |
| 2022 | 1.03x | CA$17.27 Million | CA$16.85 Million | ▲ +153.8% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | CA$8.05 Million | CA$19.92 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2020 | 0.66x | CA$11.96 Million | CA$18.08 Million | ▲ +62.1% |
| 2019 | 0.41x | CA$9.66 Million | CA$23.69 Million | ▲ +807.3% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | CA$1.13 Million | CA$25.21 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | CA$3.33 Million | CA$20.63 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | CA$4.09 Million | CA$21.28 Million | ▲ +3418.2% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | CA$129.67K | CA$23.76 Million | ▲ +120.9% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | CA$-559.75K | CA$21.43 Million | ▼ -132.1% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | CA$1.51 Million | CA$18.49 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$1.23 Million | CA$17.22 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | CA$2.46 Million | CA$16.18 Million | ▲ +176.3% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | CA$1.04 Million | CA$18.98 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | CA$2.28 Million | CA$19.57 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | CA$1.70 Million | CA$22.88 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | CA$801.76K | CA$21.17 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$903.22K | CA$22.09 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | CA$3.55 Million | CA$18.53 Million | ▲ +338.1% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | CA$699.48K | CA$16.00 Million | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$2.11 Million | CA$14.39 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | CA$1.89 Million | CA$12.19 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$1.38 Million | CA$11.33 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | CA$1.96 Million | CA$7.52 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$1.18 Million | CA$5.74 Million | ▲ +229.9% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | CA$254.47K | CA$4.10 Million | — |