IMPACT Silver Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IMPACT Silver Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio. IMPACT Silver Corp. (IPT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$21.68 Million) in one year. Check IPT cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of IMPACT Silver Corp. (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of IMPACT Silver Corp. from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for IMPACT Silver Corp. across 26 annual periods. Check IMPACT Silver Corp. (IPT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
IMPACT Silver Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
IMPACT Silver Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IMPACT Silver Corp.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see IMPACT Silver Corp. cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | CA$622.55K | CA$11.95 Million | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2024 | -1.00x | CA$-8.80 Million | CA$8.82 Million | ▼ -118.6% |
| 2023 | -0.46x | CA$-6.59 Million | CA$14.45 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2022 | -0.26x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$6.96 Million | ▼ -156.4% |
| 2021 | 0.46x | CA$3.03 Million | CA$6.58 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | CA$2.47 Million | CA$6.14 Million | ▲ +427.2% |
| 2019 | -0.12x | CA$-917.66K | CA$7.48 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2018 | -0.29x | CA$-2.30 Million | CA$8.03 Million | ▼ -1197.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | CA$188.58K | CA$7.21 Million | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2016 | 0.47x | CA$3.31 Million | CA$7.03 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$2.45 Million | CA$8.79 Million | ▲ +435.9% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | CA$-688.65K | CA$8.32 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | CA$-623.29K | CA$9.00 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2012 | -0.28x | CA$-1.99 Million | CA$7.13 Million | ▼ -117.9% |
| 2011 | 1.56x | CA$10.65 Million | CA$6.82 Million | ▲ +194.1% |
| 2010 | 0.53x | CA$4.16 Million | CA$7.85 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2009 | 0.79x | CA$4.37 Million | CA$5.55 Million | ▲ +124.9% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$4.96 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | CA$1.05 Million | CA$4.52 Million | ▲ +142.9% |
| 2006 | -0.54x | CA$-1.18 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2005 | -0.75x | CA$-277.65K | CA$372.56K | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2004 | -1.53x | CA$-147.96K | CA$96.99K | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2003 | -1.15x | CA$-83.10K | CA$72.06K | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2002 | -1.97x | CA$-79.65K | CA$40.47K | ▼ -160.0% |
| 2001 | -0.76x | CA$-84.67K | CA$111.83K | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2000 | -1.30x | CA$-101.04K | CA$77.73K | — |