International Zeolite Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
International Zeolite Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. International Zeolite Corp (IZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$117.58K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.88 Million) in one year. Check IZ operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of International Zeolite Corp (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of International Zeolite Corp from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for International Zeolite Corp across 24 annual periods. Check International Zeolite Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
International Zeolite Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
International Zeolite Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for International Zeolite Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see International Zeolite Corp (IZ) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.07x | CA$-194.97K | CA$2.70 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2023 | -0.21x | CA$-570.41K | CA$2.67 Million | ▼ -75.1% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | CA$-249.61K | CA$2.05 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | CA$-65.31K | CA$1.54 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | CA$-48.83K | CA$1.21 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 2019 | -0.54x | CA$-589.85K | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2018 | -0.96x | CA$-884.13K | CA$923.15K | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2017 | -0.83x | CA$-710.37K | CA$853.33K | ▼ -441.2% |
| 2016 | -0.15x | CA$-186.60K | CA$1.21 Million | ▼ -199.9% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | CA$-59.17K | CA$1.15 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | CA$-94.45K | CA$1.02 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | CA$-53.78K | CA$770.50K | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2012 | -0.72x | CA$-358.18K | CA$500.01K | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | CA$-290.83K | CA$497.59K | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2010 | -1.30x | CA$-474.54K | CA$363.80K | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2009 | -0.76x | CA$-294.09K | CA$385.68K | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2008 | -0.82x | CA$-343.93K | CA$417.49K | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2007 | -0.67x | CA$-298.78K | CA$444.90K | ▼ -135.8% |
| 2006 | -0.28x | CA$-157.05K | CA$551.43K | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2005 | -0.53x | CA$-274.32K | CA$513.62K | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | CA$-146.02K | CA$414.74K | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2003 | -0.86x | CA$-194.42K | CA$226.76K | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2002 | -0.75x | CA$-216.76K | CA$287.15K | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2001 | -1.87x | CA$-388.42K | CA$207.98K | — |