International Zeolite Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
International Zeolite Corp working capital to net assets ratio. International Zeolite Corp (IZ) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 98.7% as of March 2025. Working capital of CA$-2.19 Million (current assets of CA$402.77K minus current liabilities of CA$2.59 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$-2.22 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check tangible net worth ratio of International Zeolite Corp to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of International Zeolite Corp (2001–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of International Zeolite Corp from 2001 to 2024. This chart shows how International Zeolite Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of March 2025, the ratio stands at 98.7%, reflecting working capital of CA$-2.19 Million against net assets of CA$-2.22 Million CAD. See IZ days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
International Zeolite Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
International Zeolite Corp working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for International Zeolite Corp from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see how large is International Zeolite Corp's balance sheet.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 93.5% | CA$-2.05 Million | CA$-2.19 Million | CA$238.53K | CA$2.28 Million | ▲ +13.8 pp |
| 2023 | 79.7% | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$391.45K | CA$1.77 Million | ▼ -83.0 pp |
| 2022 | 162.7% | CA$-917.19K | CA$-563.86K | CA$438.00K | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +76.4 pp |
| 2021 | 86.2% | CA$-240.84K | CA$-279.29K | CA$214.20K | CA$455.04K | ▲ +31.4 pp |
| 2020 | 54.8% | CA$49.71K | CA$90.72K | CA$257.50K | CA$207.79K | ▲ +298.1 pp |
| 2019 | -243.3% | CA$-731.34K | CA$300.60K | CA$333.99K | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -313.8 pp |
| 2018 | 70.6% | CA$675.06K | CA$956.83K | CA$843.21K | CA$168.15K | ▼ -349.6 pp |
| 2017 | 420.1% | CA$696.31K | CA$165.74K | CA$754.64K | CA$58.33K | ▲ +271.9 pp |
| 2016 | 148.2% | CA$-817.33K | CA$-551.46K | CA$395.91K | CA$1.21 Million | ▲ +16.8 pp |
| 2015 | 131.4% | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$-873.21K | CA$5.90K | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2014 | 135.6% | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$-745.41K | CA$6.62K | CA$1.02 Million | ▲ +1903.7 pp |
| 2013 | -1768.1% | CA$-762.99K | CA$43.15K | CA$7.52K | CA$770.50K | ▼ -1729.9 pp |
| 2012 | -38.2% | CA$-346.10K | CA$905.62K | CA$153.91K | CA$500.01K | ▼ -42.6 pp |
| 2011 | 4.3% | CA$59.95K | CA$1.38 Million | CA$557.54K | CA$497.59K | ▲ +23.8 pp |
| 2010 | -19.5% | CA$-207.12K | CA$1.06 Million | CA$156.68K | CA$363.80K | ▲ +9.6 pp |
| 2009 | -29.1% | CA$-259.64K | CA$892.26K | CA$117.62K | CA$377.26K | ▼ -51.7 pp |
| 2008 | 22.6% | CA$277.08K | CA$1.22 Million | CA$686.15K | CA$409.07K | ▲ +13.7 pp |
| 2007 | 8.9% | CA$54.46K | CA$609.28K | CA$490.41K | CA$435.94K | ▲ +243.7 pp |
| 2006 | -234.7% | CA$-407.01K | CA$173.41K | CA$128.45K | CA$535.46K | ▼ -48.2 pp |
| 2005 | -186.5% | CA$-352.99K | CA$189.26K | CA$79.66K | CA$432.65K | ▼ -98.0 pp |
| 2004 | -88.6% | CA$-273.56K | CA$308.93K | CA$125.21K | CA$398.77K | ▼ -51.2 pp |
| 2003 | -37.4% | CA$-162.90K | CA$436.08K | CA$63.86K | CA$226.76K | ▲ +51.9 pp |
| 2002 | -89.2% | CA$-252.42K | CA$282.84K | CA$34.73K | CA$287.15K | ▼ -90.9 pp |
| 2001 | 1.6% | CA$42.70K | CA$2.61 Million | CA$250.67K | CA$207.98K | — |