Klondike Gold Corp (KG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Klondike Gold Corp (KG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.59x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-285.74K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$179.72K) in one year. Explore KG long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Klondike Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Klondike Gold Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore KG total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Klondike Gold Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Klondike Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Klondike Gold Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.85x | CA$-504.17K | CA$594.53K | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2024 | -1.83x | CA$-698.82K | CA$381.19K | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2023 | -1.29x | CA$-661.72K | CA$514.10K | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | CA$-781.00K | CA$745.70K | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2021 | -0.96x | CA$-937.67K | CA$973.94K | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2020 | -1.96x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$809.60K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -4.42x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$279.72K | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | -2.99x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$462.79K | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2017 | -3.44x | CA$-763.32K | CA$221.79K | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2016 | -4.96x | CA$-467.00K | CA$94.14K | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2015 | -4.04x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$302.61K | ▼ -206.3% |
| 2014 | -1.32x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$880.94K | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2013 | -3.12x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$345.16K | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2012 | -1.43x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$785.21K | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2011 | -0.95x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2010 | -0.54x | CA$-837.18K | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2009 | -0.40x | CA$-639.66K | CA$1.61 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2008 | -1.18x | CA$-854.24K | CA$725.80K | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2007 | -3.16x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$354.83K | ▼ -303.5% |
| 2006 | -0.78x | CA$-714.44K | CA$912.18K | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2005 | -1.89x | CA$-843.30K | CA$446.76K | ▼ -144.7% |
| 2004 | -0.77x | CA$-489.89K | CA$635.01K | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2003 | -0.74x | CA$-506.59K | CA$686.21K | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2002 | -0.41x | CA$-300.84K | CA$728.52K | ▼ -1322.1% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$23.58K | CA$697.88K | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2000 | -0.58x | CA$-199.66K | CA$347.04K | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1999 | -0.64x | CA$-310.68K | CA$489.09K | ▼ -278.5% |
| 1998 | 0.36x | CA$251.13K | CA$705.58K | ▲ +138.5% |
| 1997 | -0.92x | CA$-569.80K | CA$616.89K | — |