Klondike Gold Corp (KG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Klondike Gold Corp (KG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.59x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-285.74K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$179.72K) in one year. See Klondike Gold Corp (KG) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Klondike Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Klondike Gold Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore Klondike Gold Corp net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Klondike Gold Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Klondike Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KG market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.85x | CA$-504.17K | CA$594.53K | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2024 | -1.83x | CA$-698.82K | CA$381.19K | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2023 | -1.29x | CA$-661.72K | CA$514.10K | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | CA$-781.00K | CA$745.70K | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2021 | -0.96x | CA$-937.67K | CA$973.94K | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2020 | -1.96x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$809.60K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -4.42x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$279.72K | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | -2.99x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$462.79K | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2017 | -3.44x | CA$-763.32K | CA$221.79K | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2016 | -4.96x | CA$-467.00K | CA$94.14K | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2015 | -4.04x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$302.61K | ▼ -206.3% |
| 2014 | -1.32x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$880.94K | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2013 | -3.12x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$345.16K | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2012 | -1.43x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$785.21K | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2011 | -0.95x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2010 | -0.54x | CA$-837.18K | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2009 | -0.40x | CA$-639.66K | CA$1.61 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2008 | -1.18x | CA$-854.24K | CA$725.80K | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2007 | -3.16x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$354.83K | ▼ -303.5% |
| 2006 | -0.78x | CA$-714.44K | CA$912.18K | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2005 | -1.89x | CA$-843.30K | CA$446.76K | ▼ -144.7% |
| 2004 | -0.77x | CA$-489.89K | CA$635.01K | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2003 | -0.74x | CA$-506.59K | CA$686.21K | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2002 | -0.41x | CA$-300.84K | CA$728.52K | ▼ -1322.1% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$23.58K | CA$697.88K | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2000 | -0.58x | CA$-199.66K | CA$347.04K | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1999 | -0.64x | CA$-310.68K | CA$489.09K | ▼ -278.5% |
| 1998 | 0.36x | CA$251.13K | CA$705.58K | ▲ +138.5% |
| 1997 | -0.92x | CA$-569.80K | CA$616.89K | — |