Klondike Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Klondike Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Klondike Gold Corp (KG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.59x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-285.74K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$179.72K) in one year. Check KG cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Klondike Gold Corp (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Klondike Gold Corp from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Klondike Gold Corp across 29 annual periods. Check KG total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Klondike Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Klondike Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Klondike Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Klondike Gold Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.85x | CA$-504.17K | CA$594.53K | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2024 | -1.83x | CA$-698.82K | CA$381.19K | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2023 | -1.29x | CA$-661.72K | CA$514.10K | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | -1.05x | CA$-781.00K | CA$745.70K | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2021 | -0.96x | CA$-937.67K | CA$973.94K | ▲ +51.0% |
| 2020 | -1.96x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$809.60K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -4.42x | CA$-1.24 Million | CA$279.72K | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | -2.99x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$462.79K | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2017 | -3.44x | CA$-763.32K | CA$221.79K | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2016 | -4.96x | CA$-467.00K | CA$94.14K | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2015 | -4.04x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$302.61K | ▼ -206.3% |
| 2014 | -1.32x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$880.94K | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2013 | -3.12x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$345.16K | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2012 | -1.43x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$785.21K | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2011 | -0.95x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2010 | -0.54x | CA$-837.18K | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2009 | -0.40x | CA$-639.66K | CA$1.61 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2008 | -1.18x | CA$-854.24K | CA$725.80K | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2007 | -3.16x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$354.83K | ▼ -303.5% |
| 2006 | -0.78x | CA$-714.44K | CA$912.18K | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2005 | -1.89x | CA$-843.30K | CA$446.76K | ▼ -144.7% |
| 2004 | -0.77x | CA$-489.89K | CA$635.01K | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2003 | -0.74x | CA$-506.59K | CA$686.21K | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2002 | -0.41x | CA$-300.84K | CA$728.52K | ▼ -1322.1% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$23.58K | CA$697.88K | ▲ +105.9% |
| 2000 | -0.58x | CA$-199.66K | CA$347.04K | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1999 | -0.64x | CA$-310.68K | CA$489.09K | ▼ -278.5% |
| 1998 | 0.36x | CA$251.13K | CA$705.58K | ▲ +138.5% |
| 1997 | -0.92x | CA$-569.80K | CA$616.89K | — |