Kidoz Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kidoz Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kidoz Inc (KIDZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$491.50K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.19 Million) in one year. Check KIDZ cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kidoz Inc (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kidoz Inc from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kidoz Inc across 26 annual periods. Check KIDZ cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Kidoz Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Kidoz Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kidoz Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Kidoz Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.34x | CA$1.31 Million | CA$3.81 Million | ▲ +292.0% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | CA$-823.64K | CA$4.61 Million | ▼ -334.5% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | CA$433.75K | CA$5.70 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$851.53K | CA$4.57 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CA$256.98K | CA$2.30 Million | ▲ +112.7% |
| 2019 | -0.88x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$1.38 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2018 | -23.22x | CA$-2.11 Million | CA$90.81K | ▼ -899.4% |
| 2017 | -2.32x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$705.26K | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2016 | -5.57x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$444.68K | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2015 | -13.40x | CA$-2.38 Million | CA$177.79K | ▼ -132.5% |
| 2014 | -5.76x | CA$-902.50K | CA$156.58K | ▼ -513.3% |
| 2013 | -0.94x | CA$-224.19K | CA$238.54K | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2012 | -4.50x | CA$-475.41K | CA$105.61K | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2011 | -6.27x | CA$-603.85K | CA$96.29K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2010 | -12.03x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$137.44K | ▼ -895.2% |
| 2009 | -1.21x | CA$-837.87K | CA$693.35K | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2008 | -1.93x | CA$-877.17K | CA$454.40K | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2007 | -3.85x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$363.11K | ▼ -119.5% |
| 2006 | -1.75x | CA$-762.03K | CA$434.58K | ▼ -2503.0% |
| 2005 | -0.07x | CA$-51.72K | CA$767.77K | ▼ -132.9% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$190.88K | CA$932.99K | ▲ +812.3% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$58.75K | CA$2.62 Million | ▲ +173.6% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | CA$-83.25K | CA$2.73 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2001 | -0.25x | CA$-646.72K | CA$2.56 Million | ▲ +87.3% |
| 2000 | -1.99x | CA$-2.66 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 1999 | -8.33x | CA$-2.50 Million | CA$300.00K | — |