Kidoz Inc (KIDZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kidoz Inc (KIDZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$491.50K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.19 Million) in one year. See Kidoz Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kidoz Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kidoz Inc across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Kidoz Inc (KIDZ) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kidoz Inc (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kidoz Inc. Check Kidoz Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.34x | CA$1.31 Million | CA$3.81 Million | ▲ +292.0% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | CA$-823.64K | CA$4.61 Million | ▼ -334.5% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | CA$433.75K | CA$5.70 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$851.53K | CA$4.57 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CA$256.98K | CA$2.30 Million | ▲ +112.7% |
| 2019 | -0.88x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$1.38 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2018 | -23.22x | CA$-2.11 Million | CA$90.81K | ▼ -899.4% |
| 2017 | -2.32x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$705.26K | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2016 | -5.57x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$444.68K | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2015 | -13.40x | CA$-2.38 Million | CA$177.79K | ▼ -132.5% |
| 2014 | -5.76x | CA$-902.50K | CA$156.58K | ▼ -513.3% |
| 2013 | -0.94x | CA$-224.19K | CA$238.54K | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2012 | -4.50x | CA$-475.41K | CA$105.61K | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2011 | -6.27x | CA$-603.85K | CA$96.29K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2010 | -12.03x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$137.44K | ▼ -895.2% |
| 2009 | -1.21x | CA$-837.87K | CA$693.35K | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2008 | -1.93x | CA$-877.17K | CA$454.40K | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2007 | -3.85x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$363.11K | ▼ -119.5% |
| 2006 | -1.75x | CA$-762.03K | CA$434.58K | ▼ -2503.0% |
| 2005 | -0.07x | CA$-51.72K | CA$767.77K | ▼ -132.9% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$190.88K | CA$932.99K | ▲ +812.3% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$58.75K | CA$2.62 Million | ▲ +173.6% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | CA$-83.25K | CA$2.73 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2001 | -0.25x | CA$-646.72K | CA$2.56 Million | ▲ +87.3% |
| 2000 | -1.99x | CA$-2.66 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 1999 | -8.33x | CA$-2.50 Million | CA$300.00K | — |