Kidoz Inc (KIDZ) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Kidoz Inc (KIDZ) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 54.3% as of March 2025. Working capital of CA$4.36 Million (current assets of CA$6.55 Million minus current liabilities of CA$2.19 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$8.03 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Kidoz Inc balance sheet independence to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Kidoz Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (1999–2024)
This chart shows how Kidoz Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 26 annual periods from 1999 to 2024. As of March 2025, the ratio stands at 54.3%, reflecting working capital of CA$4.36 Million against net assets of CA$8.03 Million CAD. Check tangible equity quality of Kidoz Inc to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Kidoz Inc (1999–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Kidoz Inc from 1999 to 2024, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see Kidoz Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 53.2% | CA$4.22 Million | CA$7.93 Million | CA$8.03 Million | CA$3.81 Million | ▲ +8.5 pp |
| 2023 | 44.8% | CA$3.22 Million | CA$7.19 Million | CA$7.83 Million | CA$4.61 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2022 | 47.7% | CA$4.15 Million | CA$8.69 Million | CA$9.84 Million | CA$5.69 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2021 | 48.5% | CA$4.54 Million | CA$9.35 Million | CA$8.81 Million | CA$4.28 Million | ▲ +13.1 pp |
| 2020 | 35.4% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$8.67 Million | CA$5.25 Million | CA$2.18 Million | ▲ +9.3 pp |
| 2019 | 26.1% | CA$2.19 Million | CA$8.41 Million | CA$3.47 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -71.5 pp |
| 2018 | 97.6% | CA$662.57K | CA$678.83K | CA$753.38K | CA$90.81K | ▲ +331.8 pp |
| 2017 | -234.2% | CA$345.18K | CA$-147.41K | CA$548.13K | CA$202.95K | ▼ -229.8 pp |
| 2016 | -4.4% | CA$13.90K | CA$-315.59K | CA$110.88K | CA$96.98K | ▼ -52.2 pp |
| 2015 | 47.7% | CA$454.45K | CA$951.73K | CA$632.24K | CA$177.79K | ▼ -26.6 pp |
| 2014 | 74.4% | CA$2.86 Million | CA$3.84 Million | CA$3.01 Million | CA$156.58K | ▲ +55.2 pp |
| 2013 | 19.2% | CA$646.01K | CA$3.37 Million | CA$884.55K | CA$238.54K | ▼ -31.2 pp |
| 2012 | 50.4% | CA$1.64 Million | CA$3.26 Million | CA$1.75 Million | CA$105.61K | ▲ +17.7 pp |
| 2011 | 32.6% | CA$1.06 Million | CA$3.24 Million | CA$1.15 Million | CA$96.29K | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2010 | 43.9% | CA$1.72 Million | CA$3.93 Million | CA$1.86 Million | CA$137.44K | ▲ +45.1 pp |
| 2009 | -1.3% | CA$-19.80K | CA$1.58 Million | CA$673.54K | CA$693.35K | ▼ -8.6 pp |
| 2008 | 7.3% | CA$124.50K | CA$1.70 Million | CA$578.89K | CA$454.40K | ▼ -22.8 pp |
| 2007 | 30.1% | CA$648.12K | CA$2.15 Million | CA$1.01 Million | CA$363.11K | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2006 | 24.7% | CA$475.82K | CA$1.93 Million | CA$908.94K | CA$433.12K | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2005 | 29.5% | CA$581.86K | CA$1.97 Million | CA$1.34 Million | CA$758.37K | ▲ +127.4 pp |
| 2004 | -97.9% | CA$-625.38K | CA$638.90K | CA$150.57K | CA$775.94K | ▼ -217.6 pp |
| 2003 | 119.7% | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$116.51K | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -23.5 pp |
| 2002 | 143.2% | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$-907.03K | CA$36.70K | CA$1.34 Million | ▼ -108.9 pp |
| 2001 | 252.2% | CA$-1.05 Million | CA$-418.20K | CA$374.54K | CA$1.43 Million | ▲ +283.1 pp |
| 2000 | -30.9% | CA$-428.26K | CA$1.38 Million | CA$525.85K | CA$954.10K | ▼ -101.2 pp |
| 1999 | 70.2% | CA$3.30 Million | CA$4.70 Million | CA$3.60 Million | CA$300.00K | — |