Los Andes Copper Limited (LA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Los Andes Copper Limited (LA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-602.56K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$28.24 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Los Andes Copper Limited to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Los Andes Copper Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Los Andes Copper Limited across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LA cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Los Andes Copper Limited (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Los Andes Copper Limited. Check Los Andes Copper Limited (LA) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$23.42 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | CA$-536.67K | CA$21.32 Million | ▲ +76.9% |
| 2023 | -0.11x | CA$-3.17 Million | CA$29.13 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2022 | -0.08x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$35.11 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | CA$-1.49 Million | CA$16.09 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2020 | -0.12x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$10.31 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 2019 | -0.05x | CA$-477.68K | CA$9.56 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-826.41K | CA$9.17 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$8.46 Million | ▼ -243.9% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | CA$-280.08K | CA$7.67 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2015 | -0.21x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$5.69 Million | ▼ -579.9% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | CA$-131.22K | CA$4.19 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2013 | -0.19x | CA$-378.31K | CA$1.96 Million | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2012 | -0.35x | CA$-603.46K | CA$1.74 Million | ▼ -400.4% |
| 2011 | -0.07x | CA$-781.66K | CA$11.25 Million | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | CA$-199.15K | CA$6.09 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2009 | -0.09x | CA$-535.40K | CA$5.93 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | CA$-438.38K | CA$7.04 Million | ▲ +86.2% |
| 2007 | -0.45x | CA$-2.85 Million | CA$6.33 Million | ▼ -111.3% |
| 2006 | -0.21x | CA$-342.45K | CA$1.61 Million | ▼ -255.5% |
| 2005 | -0.06x | CA$-31.21K | CA$520.98K | ▲ +87.4% |
| 2004 | -0.48x | CA$-210.45K | CA$442.32K | ▼ -613.4% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-31.30K | CA$469.27K | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2002 | -0.22x | CA$-100.48K | CA$448.46K | ▼ -5503.4% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | CA$-1.66K | CA$415.90K | ▼ -102.1% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | CA$44.18K | CA$230.19K | ▲ +113.1% |
| 1999 | -1.46x | CA$-352.81K | CA$241.71K | — |