Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.81 Million could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$599.62K) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore LME asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.42x | CA$-3.38 Million | CA$623.34K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2023 | -6.30x | CA$-3.07 Million | CA$487.20K | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2022 | -41.17x | CA$-4.44 Million | CA$107.85K | ▼ -127.8% |
| 2021 | -18.07x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$198.95K | ▼ -102.5% |
| 2020 | -8.92x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$322.74K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2019 | -11.15x | CA$-2.11 Million | CA$189.22K | ▼ -224.1% |
| 2018 | -3.44x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$364.45K | ▼ -10895.8% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-27.50K | CA$878.92K | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | CA$-113.66K | CA$596.48K | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2015 | -1.07x | CA$-451.52K | CA$423.24K | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2014 | -0.45x | CA$-508.11K | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2013 | -0.94x | CA$-859.72K | CA$910.37K | ▼ -157.6% |
| 2012 | -0.37x | CA$-282.98K | CA$772.00K | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2011 | -1.15x | CA$-829.24K | CA$721.43K | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2010 | -2.14x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$638.94K | ▼ -373.7% |
| 2009 | -0.45x | CA$-261.94K | CA$579.60K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2008 | -1.47x | CA$-731.60K | CA$499.23K | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2007 | -1.23x | CA$-674.47K | CA$549.84K | ▼ -211.9% |
| 2006 | -0.39x | CA$-211.75K | CA$538.40K | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2005 | -1.06x | CA$-576.49K | CA$543.48K | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | CA$-552.50K | CA$886.30K | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2003 | -0.60x | CA$-623.80K | CA$1.03 Million | ▼ -625.9% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | CA$-151.12K | CA$1.82 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2001 | -0.43x | CA$-299.54K | CA$688.87K | ▼ -93.4% |
| 2000 | -0.22x | CA$-75.31K | CA$335.02K | ▼ -35.6% |
| 1999 | -0.17x | CA$-45.54K | CA$274.65K | ▲ +87.7% |
| 1998 | -1.34x | CA$-307.53K | CA$228.87K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1997 | -4.85x | CA$-121.68K | CA$25.08K | — |