Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.81 Million could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$599.62K) in one year. Check how high is Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc across 28 annual periods. Check Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LME cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.42x | CA$-3.38 Million | CA$623.34K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2023 | -6.30x | CA$-3.07 Million | CA$487.20K | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2022 | -41.17x | CA$-4.44 Million | CA$107.85K | ▼ -127.8% |
| 2021 | -18.07x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$198.95K | ▼ -102.5% |
| 2020 | -8.92x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$322.74K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2019 | -11.15x | CA$-2.11 Million | CA$189.22K | ▼ -224.1% |
| 2018 | -3.44x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$364.45K | ▼ -10895.8% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-27.50K | CA$878.92K | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | CA$-113.66K | CA$596.48K | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2015 | -1.07x | CA$-451.52K | CA$423.24K | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2014 | -0.45x | CA$-508.11K | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2013 | -0.94x | CA$-859.72K | CA$910.37K | ▼ -157.6% |
| 2012 | -0.37x | CA$-282.98K | CA$772.00K | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2011 | -1.15x | CA$-829.24K | CA$721.43K | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2010 | -2.14x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$638.94K | ▼ -373.7% |
| 2009 | -0.45x | CA$-261.94K | CA$579.60K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2008 | -1.47x | CA$-731.60K | CA$499.23K | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2007 | -1.23x | CA$-674.47K | CA$549.84K | ▼ -211.9% |
| 2006 | -0.39x | CA$-211.75K | CA$538.40K | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2005 | -1.06x | CA$-576.49K | CA$543.48K | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | CA$-552.50K | CA$886.30K | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2003 | -0.60x | CA$-623.80K | CA$1.03 Million | ▼ -625.9% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | CA$-151.12K | CA$1.82 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2001 | -0.43x | CA$-299.54K | CA$688.87K | ▼ -93.4% |
| 2000 | -0.22x | CA$-75.31K | CA$335.02K | ▼ -35.6% |
| 1999 | -0.17x | CA$-45.54K | CA$274.65K | ▲ +87.7% |
| 1998 | -1.34x | CA$-307.53K | CA$228.87K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1997 | -4.85x | CA$-121.68K | CA$25.08K | — |