Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.81 Million could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$599.62K) in one year. See Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LME stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.42x | CA$-3.38 Million | CA$623.34K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2023 | -6.30x | CA$-3.07 Million | CA$487.20K | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2022 | -41.17x | CA$-4.44 Million | CA$107.85K | ▼ -127.8% |
| 2021 | -18.07x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$198.95K | ▼ -102.5% |
| 2020 | -8.92x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$322.74K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2019 | -11.15x | CA$-2.11 Million | CA$189.22K | ▼ -224.1% |
| 2018 | -3.44x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$364.45K | ▼ -10895.8% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-27.50K | CA$878.92K | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | CA$-113.66K | CA$596.48K | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2015 | -1.07x | CA$-451.52K | CA$423.24K | ▼ -137.7% |
| 2014 | -0.45x | CA$-508.11K | CA$1.13 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2013 | -0.94x | CA$-859.72K | CA$910.37K | ▼ -157.6% |
| 2012 | -0.37x | CA$-282.98K | CA$772.00K | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2011 | -1.15x | CA$-829.24K | CA$721.43K | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2010 | -2.14x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$638.94K | ▼ -373.7% |
| 2009 | -0.45x | CA$-261.94K | CA$579.60K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2008 | -1.47x | CA$-731.60K | CA$499.23K | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2007 | -1.23x | CA$-674.47K | CA$549.84K | ▼ -211.9% |
| 2006 | -0.39x | CA$-211.75K | CA$538.40K | ▲ +62.9% |
| 2005 | -1.06x | CA$-576.49K | CA$543.48K | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2004 | -0.62x | CA$-552.50K | CA$886.30K | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2003 | -0.60x | CA$-623.80K | CA$1.03 Million | ▼ -625.9% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | CA$-151.12K | CA$1.82 Million | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2001 | -0.43x | CA$-299.54K | CA$688.87K | ▼ -93.4% |
| 2000 | -0.22x | CA$-75.31K | CA$335.02K | ▼ -35.6% |
| 1999 | -0.17x | CA$-45.54K | CA$274.65K | ▲ +87.7% |
| 1998 | -1.34x | CA$-307.53K | CA$228.87K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1997 | -4.85x | CA$-121.68K | CA$25.08K | — |