Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) — Net Asset Quality Index
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (LME) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 91.6% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$7.11 Million minus total liabilities of CA$599.62K yields net assets of CA$6.51 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See operational self-sufficiency of Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2024)
This chart shows how Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1997 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 91.6%, representing net assets of CA$6.51 Million against total assets of CA$7.11 Million CAD. Explore LME cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc (1997–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc from 1997 to 2024, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 93.9% | CA$9.57 Million | CA$10.19 Million | CA$623.34K | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2023 | 94.8% | CA$8.87 Million | CA$9.36 Million | CA$487.20K | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2022 | 98.8% | CA$9.10 Million | CA$9.21 Million | CA$107.85K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2021 | 98.0% | CA$9.72 Million | CA$9.92 Million | CA$198.95K | ▲ +9.2 pp |
| 2020 | 88.8% | CA$2.57 Million | CA$2.89 Million | CA$322.74K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2019 | 90.9% | CA$1.88 Million | CA$2.07 Million | CA$189.22K | ▲ +117.8 pp |
| 2018 | -26.9% | CA$-77.27K | CA$287.18K | CA$364.45K | ▲ +4155.3 pp |
| 2017 | -4182.2% | CA$-858.40K | CA$20.52K | CA$878.92K | ▼ -2746.1 pp |
| 2016 | -1436.1% | CA$-557.65K | CA$38.83K | CA$596.48K | ▼ -1155.0 pp |
| 2015 | -281.1% | CA$-312.18K | CA$111.06K | CA$423.24K | ▼ -349.1 pp |
| 2014 | 68.0% | CA$2.40 Million | CA$3.53 Million | CA$1.13 Million | ▼ -11.9 pp |
| 2013 | 79.9% | CA$3.61 Million | CA$4.52 Million | CA$910.37K | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2012 | 84.5% | CA$4.22 Million | CA$4.99 Million | CA$772.00K | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 85.8% | CA$4.37 Million | CA$5.09 Million | CA$721.43K | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2010 | 91.0% | CA$6.44 Million | CA$7.08 Million | CA$638.94K | ▲ +8.0 pp |
| 2009 | 83.0% | CA$2.83 Million | CA$3.41 Million | CA$579.60K | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2008 | 86.4% | CA$3.16 Million | CA$3.66 Million | CA$499.23K | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2007 | 90.0% | CA$4.92 Million | CA$5.47 Million | CA$549.84K | ▲ +11.2 pp |
| 2006 | 78.7% | CA$1.99 Million | CA$2.53 Million | CA$538.40K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2005 | 80.8% | CA$2.28 Million | CA$2.82 Million | CA$543.48K | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2004 | 77.6% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$3.96 Million | CA$886.30K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2003 | 77.7% | CA$3.60 Million | CA$4.63 Million | CA$1.03 Million | ▲ +22.3 pp |
| 2002 | 55.4% | CA$2.26 Million | CA$4.07 Million | CA$1.82 Million | ▼ -24.5 pp |
| 2001 | 79.8% | CA$2.73 Million | CA$3.42 Million | CA$688.87K | ▼ -10.2 pp |
| 2000 | 90.0% | CA$3.01 Million | CA$3.35 Million | CA$335.02K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 1999 | 92.1% | CA$3.22 Million | CA$3.50 Million | CA$274.65K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 1998 | 93.6% | CA$3.37 Million | CA$3.59 Million | CA$228.87K | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 1997 | 99.4% | CA$3.85 Million | CA$3.87 Million | CA$25.08K | — |