Metalore Resources Ltd (MET) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Metalore Resources Ltd (MET) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$176.14K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.02 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Metalore Resources Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Metalore Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Metalore Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore Metalore Resources Ltd (MET) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Metalore Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Metalore Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Metalore Resources Ltd (MET) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | CA$108.68K | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | CA$85.30K | CA$1.39 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | CA$589.06K | CA$2.20 Million | ▲ +321.3% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | CA$160.34K | CA$2.52 Million | ▼ -96.1% |
| 2021 | 1.64x | CA$3.11 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +1250.4% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$108.45K | CA$892.08K | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$239.97K | CA$1.02 Million | ▲ +520.4% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | CA$78.64K | CA$2.07 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$148.62K | CA$2.05 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$245.09K | CA$2.87 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | CA$413.90K | CA$2.88 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CA$314.82K | CA$2.74 Million | ▲ +265.0% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | CA$77.99K | CA$2.47 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | CA$235.44K | CA$2.63 Million | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | CA$428.09K | CA$2.81 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$373.20K | CA$3.15 Million | ▼ -65.4% |
| 2009 | 0.34x | CA$1.18 Million | CA$3.44 Million | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | CA$754.86K | CA$3.35 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | CA$1.40 Million | CA$3.18 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2006 | 0.44x | CA$1.31 Million | CA$3.00 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2005 | 0.41x | CA$1.09 Million | CA$2.68 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | CA$1.26 Million | CA$3.00 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2003 | 0.41x | CA$916.15K | CA$2.24 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2002 | 0.74x | CA$1.56 Million | CA$2.10 Million | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2001 | 0.38x | CA$662.97K | CA$1.76 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2000 | 0.42x | CA$800.00K | CA$1.90 Million | ▲ +110.5% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$400.00K | CA$2.00 Million | ▲ +175.0% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | CA$400.00K | CA$5.50 Million | — |