Macarthur Minerals Ltd (MMS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Macarthur Minerals Ltd (MMS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.65x as of June 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-685.30K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$416.29K) in one year. See cash generation quality of Macarthur Minerals Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Macarthur Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Macarthur Minerals Ltd across 24 annual periods. Also explore Macarthur Minerals Ltd net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Macarthur Minerals Ltd (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Macarthur Minerals Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Macarthur Minerals Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.00x | CA$-1.74 Million | CA$1.74 Million | ▲ +84.0% |
| 2023 | -6.26x | CA$-3.83 Million | CA$611.17K | ▼ -683.6% |
| 2022 | -0.80x | CA$-2.27 Million | CA$2.84 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2021 | -0.70x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$6.05 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2020 | -0.35x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$10.37 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2019 | -0.63x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2018 | -4.51x | CA$-2.89 Million | CA$640.52K | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2017 | -2.88x | CA$-3.37 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | -2.84x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$761.76K | ▼ -102.8% |
| 2015 | -1.40x | CA$-686.75K | CA$490.14K | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2014 | -6.18x | CA$-3.19 Million | CA$515.76K | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2013 | -2.91x | CA$-3.68 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▼ -243.4% |
| 2012 | -0.85x | CA$-2.15 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2011 | -1.39x | CA$-2.68 Million | CA$1.93 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2010 | -0.84x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +76.9% |
| 2009 | -3.63x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$587.26K | ▼ -499.2% |
| 2008 | -0.61x | CA$-806.72K | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2007 | -1.52x | CA$-508.66K | CA$334.06K | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2006 | -5.88x | CA$-440.81K | CA$75.01K | ▼ -813.0% |
| 2005 | -0.64x | CA$-194.38K | CA$302.00K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2004 | -10.42x | CA$-383.09K | CA$36.76K | ▼ -416.0% |
| 2003 | -2.02x | CA$-296.80K | CA$146.94K | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2002 | -22.14x | CA$-182.68K | CA$8.25K | ▼ -230.4% |
| 2001 | -6.70x | CA$-209.01K | CA$31.19K | — |