Macarthur Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Macarthur Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Macarthur Minerals Ltd (MMS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.65x as of June 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-685.30K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$416.29K) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Macarthur Minerals Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Macarthur Minerals Ltd (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Macarthur Minerals Ltd from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Macarthur Minerals Ltd across 24 annual periods. Check MMS capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Macarthur Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Macarthur Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Macarthur Minerals Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Macarthur Minerals Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.00x | CA$-1.74 Million | CA$1.74 Million | ▲ +84.0% |
| 2023 | -6.26x | CA$-3.83 Million | CA$611.17K | ▼ -683.6% |
| 2022 | -0.80x | CA$-2.27 Million | CA$2.84 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2021 | -0.70x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$6.05 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2020 | -0.35x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$10.37 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2019 | -0.63x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2018 | -4.51x | CA$-2.89 Million | CA$640.52K | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2017 | -2.88x | CA$-3.37 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | -2.84x | CA$-2.16 Million | CA$761.76K | ▼ -102.8% |
| 2015 | -1.40x | CA$-686.75K | CA$490.14K | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2014 | -6.18x | CA$-3.19 Million | CA$515.76K | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2013 | -2.91x | CA$-3.68 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▼ -243.4% |
| 2012 | -0.85x | CA$-2.15 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2011 | -1.39x | CA$-2.68 Million | CA$1.93 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2010 | -0.84x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +76.9% |
| 2009 | -3.63x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$587.26K | ▼ -499.2% |
| 2008 | -0.61x | CA$-806.72K | CA$1.33 Million | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2007 | -1.52x | CA$-508.66K | CA$334.06K | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2006 | -5.88x | CA$-440.81K | CA$75.01K | ▼ -813.0% |
| 2005 | -0.64x | CA$-194.38K | CA$302.00K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2004 | -10.42x | CA$-383.09K | CA$36.76K | ▼ -416.0% |
| 2003 | -2.02x | CA$-296.80K | CA$146.94K | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2002 | -22.14x | CA$-182.68K | CA$8.25K | ▼ -230.4% |
| 2001 | -6.70x | CA$-209.01K | CA$31.19K | — |