Macarthur Minerals Ltd (MMS) — Net Asset Quality Index
Macarthur Minerals Ltd (MMS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 97.6% as of December 2024. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$53.16 Million minus total liabilities of CA$1.28 Million yields net assets of CA$51.88 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See how many days can Macarthur Minerals Ltd fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Macarthur Minerals Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Macarthur Minerals Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of December 2024, the index stands at 97.6%, representing net assets of CA$51.88 Million against total assets of CA$53.16 Million CAD. Explore Macarthur Minerals Ltd operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Macarthur Minerals Ltd (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Macarthur Minerals Ltd from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see MMS market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 97.8% | CA$75.95 Million | CA$77.69 Million | CA$1.74 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2023 | 99.2% | CA$80.08 Million | CA$80.69 Million | CA$611.17K | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2022 | 96.4% | CA$75.64 Million | CA$78.48 Million | CA$2.84 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2021 | 91.9% | CA$68.19 Million | CA$74.23 Million | CA$6.05 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2020 | 85.6% | CA$61.56 Million | CA$71.94 Million | CA$10.37 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2019 | 95.3% | CA$60.43 Million | CA$63.43 Million | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2018 | 91.8% | CA$7.13 Million | CA$7.77 Million | CA$640.52K | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2017 | 84.1% | CA$6.17 Million | CA$7.34 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2016 | 88.3% | CA$5.75 Million | CA$6.52 Million | CA$761.76K | ▼ -10.9 pp |
| 2015 | 99.2% | CA$63.78 Million | CA$64.27 Million | CA$490.14K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2014 | 99.2% | CA$62.77 Million | CA$63.29 Million | CA$515.76K | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2013 | 98.1% | CA$66.43 Million | CA$67.69 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2012 | 96.5% | CA$70.44 Million | CA$72.97 Million | CA$2.54 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2011 | 97.4% | CA$72.55 Million | CA$74.48 Million | CA$1.93 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2010 | 92.9% | CA$17.76 Million | CA$19.13 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2009 | 97.0% | CA$19.11 Million | CA$19.70 Million | CA$587.26K | ▲ +9.8 pp |
| 2008 | 87.2% | CA$9.06 Million | CA$10.39 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2007 | 92.0% | CA$3.85 Million | CA$4.19 Million | CA$334.06K | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2006 | 96.5% | CA$2.05 Million | CA$2.13 Million | CA$75.01K | ▲ +245.2 pp |
| 2005 | -148.7% | CA$-180.59K | CA$121.41K | CA$302.00K | ▼ -204.8 pp |
| 2004 | 56.1% | CA$46.97K | CA$83.72K | CA$36.76K | ▼ -40.2 pp |
| 2003 | 96.3% | CA$3.87 Million | CA$4.02 Million | CA$146.94K | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2002 | 99.8% | CA$4.36 Million | CA$4.37 Million | CA$8.25K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2001 | 99.3% | CA$4.17 Million | CA$4.20 Million | CA$31.19K | — |