New Age Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New Age Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. New Age Metals Inc (NAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.06x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-492.83K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$238.70K) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of New Age Metals Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of New Age Metals Inc (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of New Age Metals Inc from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for New Age Metals Inc across 24 annual periods. Check NAM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
New Age Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
New Age Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New Age Metals Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NAM cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.45x | CA$245.97K | CA$169.15K | ▲ +293.9% |
| 2024 | -0.75x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 2023 | -1.36x | CA$-548.31K | CA$403.97K | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2022 | -1.62x | CA$-459.77K | CA$283.21K | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2021 | -3.62x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$337.45K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2020 | -6.43x | CA$-729.00K | CA$113.31K | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2019 | -4.64x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$239.22K | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2018 | -5.37x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$261.13K | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2017 | -4.45x | CA$-701.12K | CA$157.50K | ▼ -4017.8% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-195.14K | CA$1.81 Million | ▲ +65.0% |
| 2015 | -0.31x | CA$-555.33K | CA$1.80 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2014 | -20.92x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$54.69K | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2013 | -22.53x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$75.36K | ▼ -246.4% |
| 2012 | -6.50x | CA$-2.69 Million | CA$413.71K | ▼ -126.4% |
| 2011 | -2.87x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$480.65K | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2010 | -13.96x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$96.95K | ▼ -4492.6% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$4.52 Million | ▲ +95.4% |
| 2008 | -6.62x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$226.91K | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2007 | -8.52x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$139.44K | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2006 | -18.02x | CA$-1.17 Million | CA$64.89K | ▼ -141.6% |
| 2005 | -7.46x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$136.01K | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2004 | -5.95x | CA$-755.08K | CA$126.86K | ▼ -123.7% |
| 2003 | -2.66x | CA$-792.92K | CA$298.04K | ▼ -341.3% |
| 2002 | -0.60x | CA$-863.33K | CA$1.43 Million | — |