New Age Metals Inc (NAM) — Financial Flexibility Index
New Age Metals Inc (NAM) has a Financial Flexibility Index of 1.92x as of January 2026. Free cash flow of CA$458.63K (operating CF CA$-492.83K minus capex CA$951.47K) represents 2% of total liabilities (CA$238.70K). Check NAM capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
New Age Metals Inc Financial Flexibility Index (2002–2025)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for New Age Metals Inc across 24 annual periods. See New Age Metals Inc short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for New Age Metals Inc (2002–2025)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for New Age Metals Inc. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see New Age Metals Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (CAD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.67x | CA$790.43K | CA$245.97K | CA$169.15K | ▲ +2820.8% |
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-320.59K | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▼ -103.7% |
| 2023 | 4.68x | CA$1.89 Million | CA$-548.31K | CA$403.97K | ▲ +406.7% |
| 2022 | -1.52x | CA$-431.77K | CA$-459.77K | CA$283.21K | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2021 | -3.34x | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$337.45K | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2020 | -1.58x | CA$-178.60K | CA$-729.00K | CA$113.31K | ▼ -109.5% |
| 2019 | -0.75x | CA$-179.98K | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$239.22K | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2018 | -1.00x | CA$-260.43K | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$261.13K | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2017 | -0.86x | CA$-135.53K | CA$-701.12K | CA$157.50K | ▼ -887.0% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | CA$-157.38K | CA$-195.14K | CA$1.81 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2015 | -0.24x | CA$-424.93K | CA$-555.33K | CA$1.80 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2014 | -18.81x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$54.69K | ▼ -29.2% |
| 2013 | -14.56x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$75.36K | ▼ -966.0% |
| 2012 | 1.68x | CA$695.42K | CA$-2.69 Million | CA$413.71K | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2011 | 1.16x | CA$559.92K | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$480.65K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2010 | 1.61x | CA$156.25K | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$96.95K | ▲ +1239.5% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | CA$543.38K | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$4.52 Million | ▼ -98.8% |
| 2008 | 9.69x | CA$2.20 Million | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$226.91K | ▲ +519.0% |
| 2007 | -2.31x | CA$-322.47K | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$139.44K | ▼ -113.0% |
| 2006 | 17.83x | CA$1.16 Million | CA$-1.17 Million | CA$64.89K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 15.73x | CA$2.14 Million | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$136.01K | ▲ +72.1% |
| 2004 | 9.14x | CA$1.16 Million | CA$-755.08K | CA$126.86K | ▲ +343.9% |
| 2003 | 2.06x | CA$613.95K | CA$-792.92K | CA$298.04K | ▲ +453.5% |
| 2002 | -0.58x | CA$-834.54K | CA$-863.33K | CA$1.43 Million | — |