Niobay Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Niobay Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Niobay Metals Inc (NBY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -6.95x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.30 Million could theoretically repay -7% of its total liabilities (CA$187.11K) in one year. Check NBY cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Niobay Metals Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Niobay Metals Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Niobay Metals Inc across 28 annual periods. Check Niobay Metals Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Niobay Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Niobay Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Niobay Metals Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Niobay Metals Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.79x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$382.57K | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2023 | -14.33x | CA$-2.21 Million | CA$154.49K | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2022 | -7.89x | CA$-6.17 Million | CA$782.90K | ▼ -127.6% |
| 2021 | -3.47x | CA$-3.83 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2020 | -2.73x | CA$-2.89 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▼ -40.1% |
| 2019 | -1.95x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$683.82K | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2018 | -3.49x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$331.34K | ▼ -130.2% |
| 2017 | -1.51x | CA$-663.69K | CA$438.31K | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2016 | -1.05x | CA$-652.03K | CA$620.60K | ▼ -916.7% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | CA$-44.65K | CA$432.08K | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2014 | -0.83x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$1.33 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2013 | -0.74x | CA$-897.79K | CA$1.22 Million | ▼ -160.4% |
| 2012 | 1.22x | CA$2.45 Million | CA$2.00 Million | ▲ +285.0% |
| 2011 | -0.66x | CA$-1.17 Million | CA$1.77 Million | ▼ -2739.9% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | CA$100.21K | CA$4.01 Million | ▼ -99.5% |
| 2009 | 5.31x | CA$6.09 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2008 | 14.64x | CA$8.37 Million | CA$571.70K | ▲ +6392.9% |
| 2007 | -0.23x | CA$-1.90 Million | CA$8.17 Million | ▼ -410.7% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | CA$-873.67K | CA$19.18 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | CA$-763.64K | CA$23.10 Million | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | CA$-3.18 Million | CA$15.63 Million | ▼ -442.7% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | CA$487.47K | CA$8.22 Million | ▲ +219.4% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | CA$-319.70K | CA$6.44 Million | ▲ +92.3% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$2.98 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2000 | -0.62x | CA$-129.49K | CA$209.26K | ▲ +75.8% |
| 1999 | -2.56x | CA$-754.67K | CA$294.83K | ▼ -505.0% |
| 1998 | 0.63x | CA$204.80K | CA$324.02K | ▲ +131.0% |
| 1997 | -2.04x | CA$-464.25K | CA$227.34K | — |