CGX Energy Inc. (OYL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CGX Energy Inc. (OYL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$19.53 Million) in one year. Check CGX Energy Inc. investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CGX Energy Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CGX Energy Inc. across 27 annual periods. Also explore OYL total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CGX Energy Inc. (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CGX Energy Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OYL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$19.53 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | CA$-4.33 Million | CA$18.40 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | CA$-3.67 Million | CA$21.45 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2022 | -0.31x | CA$-8.49 Million | CA$27.67 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2021 | -0.27x | CA$-16.08 Million | CA$60.44 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2020 | -0.29x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$14.58 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2019 | -0.42x | CA$-9.13 Million | CA$21.83 Million | ▼ -674.3% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | CA$-3.20 Million | CA$59.32 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$48.99 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$41.31 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | CA$-3.39 Million | CA$35.60 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2014 | -0.15x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$16.57 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2013 | -4.94x | CA$-9.83 Million | CA$1.99 Million | ▼ -899.7% |
| 2012 | -0.49x | CA$-9.10 Million | CA$18.40 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2011 | -0.41x | CA$-4.48 Million | CA$10.92 Million | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2010 | -1.84x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$1.95 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2009 | -5.86x | CA$-4.77 Million | CA$813.31K | ▼ -1301.6% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | CA$2.88 Million | CA$5.90 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2007 | -1.52x | CA$-2.60 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2006 | -2.28x | CA$-3.91 Million | CA$1.72 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2005 | -5.29x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$887.21K | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2004 | -2.38x | CA$-3.68 Million | CA$1.54 Million | ▼ -2359.8% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | CA$48.14K | CA$456.62K | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2002 | -4.99x | CA$-709.70K | CA$142.30K | ▼ -102.7% |
| 2001 | -2.46x | CA$-488.37K | CA$198.45K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2000 | -3.52x | CA$-657.94K | CA$186.77K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 1999 | -4.98x | CA$-402.29K | CA$80.79K | — |