CGX Energy Inc. (OYL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CGX Energy Inc. (OYL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$19.53 Million) in one year. See CGX Energy Inc. free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CGX Energy Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CGX Energy Inc. across 27 annual periods. Also explore CGX Energy Inc. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CGX Energy Inc. (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CGX Energy Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CGX Energy Inc. (OYL) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.13x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$19.53 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | CA$-4.33 Million | CA$18.40 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | CA$-3.67 Million | CA$21.45 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2022 | -0.31x | CA$-8.49 Million | CA$27.67 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2021 | -0.27x | CA$-16.08 Million | CA$60.44 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2020 | -0.29x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$14.58 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2019 | -0.42x | CA$-9.13 Million | CA$21.83 Million | ▼ -674.3% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | CA$-3.20 Million | CA$59.32 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$48.99 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$41.31 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | CA$-3.39 Million | CA$35.60 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2014 | -0.15x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$16.57 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2013 | -4.94x | CA$-9.83 Million | CA$1.99 Million | ▼ -899.7% |
| 2012 | -0.49x | CA$-9.10 Million | CA$18.40 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2011 | -0.41x | CA$-4.48 Million | CA$10.92 Million | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2010 | -1.84x | CA$-3.59 Million | CA$1.95 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2009 | -5.86x | CA$-4.77 Million | CA$813.31K | ▼ -1301.6% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | CA$2.88 Million | CA$5.90 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2007 | -1.52x | CA$-2.60 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2006 | -2.28x | CA$-3.91 Million | CA$1.72 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2005 | -5.29x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$887.21K | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2004 | -2.38x | CA$-3.68 Million | CA$1.54 Million | ▼ -2359.8% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | CA$48.14K | CA$456.62K | ▲ +102.1% |
| 2002 | -4.99x | CA$-709.70K | CA$142.30K | ▼ -102.7% |
| 2001 | -2.46x | CA$-488.37K | CA$198.45K | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2000 | -3.52x | CA$-657.94K | CA$186.77K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 1999 | -4.98x | CA$-402.29K | CA$80.79K | — |